Diagramming an Active Filter: How Do I Calculate Ripple Control?

  • Thread starter Thread starter BenBa
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Filter
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the calculation of ripple control in an active filter circuit, particularly in the context of an introductory analog circuits class. Participants explore the behavior of overlapping signals, the effects of a diode and capacitor in the circuit, and the implications of the time constant on signal processing.

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses uncertainty about how the active filter operates and questions the drawing of overlapping signals, suggesting that the 20 KHz wave modulates the 100 KHz signal.
  • Another participant critiques the problem statement, indicating that the circuit's non-linear nature complicates the generation of a Bode plot.
  • Several participants discuss the implications of the R1-C1 time constant, with one suggesting that it leads to significant attenuation of frequencies around 20 KHz and above.
  • There is a mention of a potential misunderstanding regarding the ripple control formula and its application to the circuit's output voltage.
  • One participant seeks clarification on the "squashing" effect of the RC time constant on higher frequency signals and how it relates to ripple control.
  • Another participant confirms the calculation of the corner frequency for a high-pass filter stage, indicating that signals below this frequency will be attenuated.
  • There are repeated requests for clarification on the effects of capacitor charging and discharging on the output voltage and ripple control.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the operation of the filter and the implications of the time constant, with no consensus reached on the correctness of assumptions or interpretations of the circuit's behavior.

Contextual Notes

Participants note potential issues with the problem statement and assumptions regarding modulation and frequency response, but these remain unresolved within the discussion.

BenBa
Messages
50
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



EsY66M6.png


Homework Equations



See picture

The Attempt at a Solution



I am unsure how this filter works (i am in an intro to analog circuits class and we barely covered active filters).

Here is my attempt at drawing the input voltage:

ny7u3rH.png


you can see I used the 20KHz wave as an envelope for the 100Khz signal, drawing 5 full waves of the 100KHz within one half wave of the 20KHz, but i am not fully sure if this is the correct thing to draw as i have never worked with overlapping signals...

As for the voltage at the point specified, i believe that all that does is cut off the bottom portion of what I drew as well as decrease the voltage by 0.7 volts (The standard voltage drop of a diode). But i am not sure if this is correct.

For part B I have no clue how to approach this. I didn't know this filter had gain, i thought active filters just filtered...

EDIT: For part a i just realized that there is a capacitor acting as ripple control, so the output should not just be the top half of the input, but how do i calculate this ripple control?

Still super confused about part b.

EDIT 2: I just realized my scaling is off, i should have 2.5 waves of the 100KHz within on half wave of the 20KHz, so 5 waves total over the full length of the 20KHz.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
First, the problem is badly stated. "Add" 20 KHz to 100 Khz would look something like what you drew for the input voltage, not the cited node. But then there's the word "carrier" which suggests the 100 KHz is modulated somehow (how is not stated) by the 20 KHz.

Looking at the time constant R1 C1 ~ 1 KHz it would seem that the intent is to provide a modulated signal with several sidebands so that the LSB is pushed down to near dc. Then the + part of the LSB would get through which is a half-wave rectification, sort of.

Thanks to D1 I can see no way a Bode plot of this circuit could be conceived, let alone generated. Bode plots assume linear systems and this is highly non-linear ...
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Ihttp://forum.allaboutcircuits.com/showthread.php?p=675439#post675439, and i seem to have got a correct answer. But i may have made a mistake in my assumptions, do you see anything wrong with my logic?

Also i think the bode plot is referring to the second stage that acts as a high pass active filter with f0 = 1/2piRC?
 
BenBa said:
Ihttp://forum.allaboutcircuits.com/showthread.php?p=675439#post675439, and i seem to have got a correct answer. But i may have made a mistake in my assumptions, do you see anything wrong with my logic?

I looked at the link and it's incorrect. Any frequency in the neighborhood of 20 KHz and up will be squashed at the cathode of D1. That's because the R1-C1 time constant is so large (0.15 ms.) that after a few cycles of input C1 is charged to near the positive peak of the input voltage and then sits there with only a small ripple on it, since R1 does not have time to discharge it significantly between input cycles.

I repeat, unless this is a modulation process with some very much lower frequencies generated by that process, in the neighborhood of 1 KHz or less, then this circuit does effectively nothing.
Also I think the bode plot is referring to the second stage that acts as a high pass active filter with f0 = 1/2piRC?

That is much more believable! So go ahead and have a stab at it? What's the transfer function from U1 output to U2 output? (I am labeling the two op amps U1 and U2 from left to right).
 
I'm sorry, can you explain what you mean about the "squashing" of the 20Hz signals and up due to the RC time constant? The capacitor charges up some and then slowly charges down but according to the ripple control formula the change in V is only equal to 0.02 volts, right? What is wrong with that analysis?

As for the second part, i believe the corner frequency is at 1/(2*pi*R1*C2) = 106.1 Hz, so any signals lower than this will be cut off and any higher will be passed, correct?
 
BenBa said:
I'm sorry, can you explain what you mean about the "squashing" of the 20Hz signals and up due to the RC time constant? The capacitor charges up some and then slowly charges down but according to the ripple control formula the change in V is only equal to 0.02 volts, right? What is wrong with that analysis?

20 Hz? You said 20 KHz! 20 Hz is an entirely different matter. I pointed out that only low frequencies could get past the R1-C1 time constant and 20 Hz certainly qualifies!
As for the second part, I believe the corner frequency is at 1/(2*pi*R1*C2) = 106.1 Hz, so any signals lower than this will be cut off and any higher will be passed, correct?

That is entirely correct.
 
Sorry i meant to say 20KHz, i was refferng to where you said:

rude man said:
I looked at the link and it's incorrect. Any frequency in the neighborhood of 20 KHz and up will be squashed at the cathode of D1.

Can you explain this?

I am trying to figure out why my diagram on the other forum is incorrect, i know the capacitor discharges slowly, but how does that effect the overall V of the ripple control?
 
BenBa said:
Sorry i meant to say 20KHz, i was refferng to where you said:



Can you explain this?

I am trying to figure out why my diagram on the other forum is incorrect, i know the capacitor discharges slowly, but how does that effect the overall V of the ripple control?

I already explained. The capacitor charges up quickly to the peak of the input voltage, then because it has almost no time to even partially discharge all you get at D1 cathode is a small ripple at the peaks' frequency, plus the rectified dc voltage. The dc voltage ~ the peak of the input voltage. But the dc does not pass through the second stage hi-pass filter.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
8K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
7K