Dialectric inserted into capacitor => creation of a double-capacitor

AI Thread Summary
Inserting a dielectric between capacitor plates alters the permittivity, effectively changing the capacitor's capacitance. The dielectric behaves as if it creates two capacitors in series due to the different potential gradients across the dielectric and the air gap. This results in induced charges that differ from those on the capacitor plates, as the dielectric material can polarize. The thickness and composition of the dielectric significantly influence the overall capacitance. Understanding these principles is crucial for analyzing capacitor behavior in electrical circuits.
Nikitin
Messages
734
Reaction score
27
A dialectic of width d is inserted into a capacitor made up of two plates, with the plates being a distance D apart. D>d. Afterwards, the capacitor acts like it is two capacitor connected in series. Why? I mean how the heck is the dialectic supposed to get induced charges equivalent to the ones on the capacitor-plates?

the situation is illustrated in the solution manual. Look for assignment 4b ("Oppgave 4 b", page 4) http://folk.ntnu.no/sveinoll/ov/TFY/4155%20Elektrisitet%20og%20Elektromagnetisme/V11/LF/Ov06los.pdf . The situation as described is like A, and the capacitor acts like in B.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org


I mean how the heck is the dialectic supposed to get induced charges equivalent to the ones on the capacitor-plates?
It is not, why do you expect this?

You can imagine adding an additional conducting plate of "0" thickness between the dielectric and the air (or whatever) without changing the capacity. But then you just have two different capacitors in series.
This is possible without dielectric, too, by the way.
 


A dialectric in series has equal charges on all the plates. Why doesn't this dialectric have that?
 


I'm not 100% certain what your question is. But putting a dielectric in-between the plates causes the permittivity in-between the plates to change. And this means that the capacity of the capacitor will change. So by selecting a material of a certain permittivity, you can choose the capacitance of the capacitor. pretty neat.
 


With or without a layer of metal between the dielectric and the air, I think the same situation exists. There will be a potential gradient across the air gap and a different (shallower) potential gradient across the dielectric because the molecules of the dielectric can polarise. It's just like two capacitors in series, sharing the total PD. The equivalent capacitance will be greater than for an air gap and less than when full of dielectric.
 


Nikitin said:
A dialectric in series has equal charges on all the plates. Why doesn't this dialectric have that?

its spelt ... Dielectric :)

It seems you don't realize or understand what a dielectric is
its the non-conductive layer between 2 plates of a capacitor
it may be composed of air, paper or ceramic amongst other things

The thickness and composition of which, as others have said, will have an effect on the value of capacitance


Dave
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
It may be shown from the equations of electromagnetism, by James Clerk Maxwell in the 1860’s, that the speed of light in the vacuum of free space is related to electric permittivity (ϵ) and magnetic permeability (μ) by the equation: c=1/√( μ ϵ ) . This value is a constant for the vacuum of free space and is independent of the motion of the observer. It was this fact, in part, that led Albert Einstein to Special Relativity.
Back
Top