MHB Did I misinterpret the sign attached to a term when factoring?

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around the correct factoring of the expression xy+x-2y-2. The original attempt resulted in x(y+1)-2(y-1), which was incorrect due to a misunderstanding of sign when factoring out -2. The correct factorization is x(y+1)-2(y+1), leading to (x-2)(y+1). The key takeaway is that when factoring out a negative, the signs within the parentheses must change, highlighting the importance of careful sign management in algebraic manipulation. Understanding these nuances is crucial for accurate factoring in future problems.
find_the_fun
Messages
147
Reaction score
0
I wanted to factor [math]xy+x-2y-2[/math]
I got [math]x(y+1)-2(y-1)[/math] and got stuck

I tried somethings out and noticed [math](x-2)(y+1)=xy+x-2y-2[/math] so how come I did get stuck? Did I extract the [math]2[/math] incorrectly with the sign? For example should I have interpreted it at [math]-2y-2[/math] not [math]2y-2[/math]?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
find_the_fun said:
I wanted to factor [math]xy+x-2y-2[/math]
I got [math]x(y+1)-2(y-1)[/math] and got stuck

I tried somethings out and noticed [math](x-2)(y+1)=xy+x-2y-2[/math] so how come I did get stuck? Did I extract the [math]2[/math] incorrectly with the sign? For example should I have interpreted it at [math]-2y-2[/math] not [math]2y-2[/math]?

Yes, you simply factored incorrectly.

[math]xy+x-2y-2=x(y+1)-2(y+1)=(x-2)(y+1)[/math]

When you factor a negative factor from a group of terms, the signs of everything within the resulting parentheses must change.
 
MarkFL said:
Yes, you simply factored incorrectly.

[math]xy+x-2y-2=x(y+1)-2(y+1)=(x-2)(y+1)[/math]

When you factor a negative factor from a group of terms, the signs of everything within the resulting parentheses must change.

But [math]2y-2[/math] can be factored to [math]2(y-1)[/math]. Since [math]2y-2[/math] appears in the equation can't we say [math]...-(2y-2)=...-(2(y-1))[/math]?
 
It is $-2y-2$ that appears in the expression...and both terms have $-2$ as a factor. :D
 
find_the_fun said:
But [math]2y-2[/math] can be factored to [math]2(y-1)[/math]. Since [math]2y-2[/math] appears in the equation can't we say [math]...-(2y-2)=...-(2(y-1))[/math]?

That's the point. [math]2y-2[/math] does not appear in the equation.
You can read the equation as:
$$xy+x−2y−2 = xy+x+(−2)y+(−2)$$

As you can see $(−2)y+(−2)$ is definitely different from $2y-2$.

From here we can get to:
$$xy+x+(−2)y+(−2) = x(y+1)+(−2)(y+1)$$

Which can also be written as:
$$x(y+1)−2(y+1)$$
 
I guess I see what I did wrong, I did something like, took a -2 inserted a bracket and pretend it was positive. I try to understand exactly what went wrong in hopes of not making the same mistake again.
 
Thread 'Erroneously  finding discrepancy in transpose rule'
Obviously, there is something elementary I am missing here. To form the transpose of a matrix, one exchanges rows and columns, so the transpose of a scalar, considered as (or isomorphic to) a one-entry matrix, should stay the same, including if the scalar is a complex number. On the other hand, in the isomorphism between the complex plane and the real plane, a complex number a+bi corresponds to a matrix in the real plane; taking the transpose we get which then corresponds to a-bi...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K