MHB Did I misinterpret the sign attached to a term when factoring?

find_the_fun
Messages
147
Reaction score
0
I wanted to factor [math]xy+x-2y-2[/math]
I got [math]x(y+1)-2(y-1)[/math] and got stuck

I tried somethings out and noticed [math](x-2)(y+1)=xy+x-2y-2[/math] so how come I did get stuck? Did I extract the [math]2[/math] incorrectly with the sign? For example should I have interpreted it at [math]-2y-2[/math] not [math]2y-2[/math]?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
find_the_fun said:
I wanted to factor [math]xy+x-2y-2[/math]
I got [math]x(y+1)-2(y-1)[/math] and got stuck

I tried somethings out and noticed [math](x-2)(y+1)=xy+x-2y-2[/math] so how come I did get stuck? Did I extract the [math]2[/math] incorrectly with the sign? For example should I have interpreted it at [math]-2y-2[/math] not [math]2y-2[/math]?

Yes, you simply factored incorrectly.

[math]xy+x-2y-2=x(y+1)-2(y+1)=(x-2)(y+1)[/math]

When you factor a negative factor from a group of terms, the signs of everything within the resulting parentheses must change.
 
MarkFL said:
Yes, you simply factored incorrectly.

[math]xy+x-2y-2=x(y+1)-2(y+1)=(x-2)(y+1)[/math]

When you factor a negative factor from a group of terms, the signs of everything within the resulting parentheses must change.

But [math]2y-2[/math] can be factored to [math]2(y-1)[/math]. Since [math]2y-2[/math] appears in the equation can't we say [math]...-(2y-2)=...-(2(y-1))[/math]?
 
It is $-2y-2$ that appears in the expression...and both terms have $-2$ as a factor. :D
 
find_the_fun said:
But [math]2y-2[/math] can be factored to [math]2(y-1)[/math]. Since [math]2y-2[/math] appears in the equation can't we say [math]...-(2y-2)=...-(2(y-1))[/math]?

That's the point. [math]2y-2[/math] does not appear in the equation.
You can read the equation as:
$$xy+x−2y−2 = xy+x+(−2)y+(−2)$$

As you can see $(−2)y+(−2)$ is definitely different from $2y-2$.

From here we can get to:
$$xy+x+(−2)y+(−2) = x(y+1)+(−2)(y+1)$$

Which can also be written as:
$$x(y+1)−2(y+1)$$
 
I guess I see what I did wrong, I did something like, took a -2 inserted a bracket and pretend it was positive. I try to understand exactly what went wrong in hopes of not making the same mistake again.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top