MHB Did I misinterpret the sign attached to a term when factoring?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the correct factoring of the expression xy+x-2y-2. The original attempt resulted in x(y+1)-2(y-1), which was incorrect due to a misunderstanding of sign when factoring out -2. The correct factorization is x(y+1)-2(y+1), leading to (x-2)(y+1). The key takeaway is that when factoring out a negative, the signs within the parentheses must change, highlighting the importance of careful sign management in algebraic manipulation. Understanding these nuances is crucial for accurate factoring in future problems.
find_the_fun
Messages
147
Reaction score
0
I wanted to factor [math]xy+x-2y-2[/math]
I got [math]x(y+1)-2(y-1)[/math] and got stuck

I tried somethings out and noticed [math](x-2)(y+1)=xy+x-2y-2[/math] so how come I did get stuck? Did I extract the [math]2[/math] incorrectly with the sign? For example should I have interpreted it at [math]-2y-2[/math] not [math]2y-2[/math]?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
find_the_fun said:
I wanted to factor [math]xy+x-2y-2[/math]
I got [math]x(y+1)-2(y-1)[/math] and got stuck

I tried somethings out and noticed [math](x-2)(y+1)=xy+x-2y-2[/math] so how come I did get stuck? Did I extract the [math]2[/math] incorrectly with the sign? For example should I have interpreted it at [math]-2y-2[/math] not [math]2y-2[/math]?

Yes, you simply factored incorrectly.

[math]xy+x-2y-2=x(y+1)-2(y+1)=(x-2)(y+1)[/math]

When you factor a negative factor from a group of terms, the signs of everything within the resulting parentheses must change.
 
MarkFL said:
Yes, you simply factored incorrectly.

[math]xy+x-2y-2=x(y+1)-2(y+1)=(x-2)(y+1)[/math]

When you factor a negative factor from a group of terms, the signs of everything within the resulting parentheses must change.

But [math]2y-2[/math] can be factored to [math]2(y-1)[/math]. Since [math]2y-2[/math] appears in the equation can't we say [math]...-(2y-2)=...-(2(y-1))[/math]?
 
It is $-2y-2$ that appears in the expression...and both terms have $-2$ as a factor. :D
 
find_the_fun said:
But [math]2y-2[/math] can be factored to [math]2(y-1)[/math]. Since [math]2y-2[/math] appears in the equation can't we say [math]...-(2y-2)=...-(2(y-1))[/math]?

That's the point. [math]2y-2[/math] does not appear in the equation.
You can read the equation as:
$$xy+x−2y−2 = xy+x+(−2)y+(−2)$$

As you can see $(−2)y+(−2)$ is definitely different from $2y-2$.

From here we can get to:
$$xy+x+(−2)y+(−2) = x(y+1)+(−2)(y+1)$$

Which can also be written as:
$$x(y+1)−2(y+1)$$
 
I guess I see what I did wrong, I did something like, took a -2 inserted a bracket and pretend it was positive. I try to understand exactly what went wrong in hopes of not making the same mistake again.
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...

Similar threads

Back
Top