1. Limited time only! Sign up for a free 30min personal tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Did I waste my time getting a 2nd degree?

  1. Dec 29, 2014 #1
    I graduated with degrees in both mechanical engineering and physics the past spring. I'm sort of feeling however that I wasted my time doing this. And by that I mean that a BS in physics does nothing in terms of finding jobs (unlike a BS in engineering). And also not going for a PhD in physics after getting the BS basically means that my physics career is over. I also feel like if I had only done one degree or the other then I would have done much better in that degree in terms of grades and experience. Any thoughts on this?

    But then again it is also all in the past now so I guess that's good? I guess there is also the idea of where to go from here. I suppose my main area of interest is to pursue a career in nuclear engineering. I just finished applying to a lot of PhD programs in NE and am waiting to hear results. But how else could I leverage my double degree to my advantage? I feel like there was a lot of overlap in terms of computational skills learned so I'm not too sure I can do much there.

    Also, what about non-STEM jobs? I've heard a lot of STEM majors can take jobs in consulting without leveraging their technical skills and just leveraging the fact they have a degree and the employer looks at that as them being intelligent/competent. Could I leverage my double degree to show that I would be a great employee even if I never actually use anything I learned in school?
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Dec 29, 2014 #2

    Dale

    Staff: Mentor

    This is a key point. You cannot change the past so don't spend much time worrying about it at this time. In business, this is known as a sunk cost, and you never make business decisions based on sunk costs, only marginal costs (the difference in costs between the available options).
     
  4. Dec 29, 2014 #3
    Ok so where to go from here? I have two degrees which is good because I know much more engineering than other physics students and I know much more physics than engineering students. On the flip side, I perhaps do not have as much in-depth experience in either as I possibly could. I would really like to do a PhD permitting I can get into a program with a funding offer. However, I'm not sure I have the in-depth skill set necessary to thrive.
     
  5. Dec 29, 2014 #4

    Dale

    Staff: Mentor

    From your perspective what would be the benefit of the PhD? "I want to get a PhD because if I don't I won't be able to ..."
     
  6. Dec 29, 2014 #5
    Well I would like to get a real nice research and design job realistically. Really trying to avoid the whole management track. I would like to enter academia or perhaps work at a DOE lab but those are less realistic options. And perhaps along the way of getting a PhD other opportunities would arise that I had not previously thought about.
     
  7. Dec 29, 2014 #6

    Dale

    Staff: Mentor

    You may want to consider accelerator physics or some other type of program involving the development of experimental hardware. Your dual degrees would be advantageous there. Otherwise it sounds like the engineering degree may be your "core competency" with the physics as a "bonus".
     
  8. Dec 29, 2014 #7
    I've heard good things about accelerator physics in terms of number of available jobs. Do you think I could get a job in that or maybe something like designing medical devices with just an undergrad education?
     
  9. Dec 29, 2014 #8

    Dale

    Staff: Mentor

    Yes. There are such jobs available. You will not be in charge or making the major decisions as an undergrad, but it seems from your previous comments that may not be something you want to do anyway.
     
  10. Dec 29, 2014 #9

    DEvens

    User Avatar
    Education Advisor
    Gold Member

    Seriously, how many times have you heard of an unemployed physicist? There are a few, there must be. But not many. And mech engineers without jobs are fairly rare also.

    Get your job app out to industries and labs you might like to work for. Keep looking at new marketable skills. Brush up on any skill you can pick up and add that to your CV. Example: If you don't already know, learn how to use VB for Excel. It will be useful in many jobs anyway. And get that on your CV.

    Don't be discouraged if the first several ignore you as though you never sent in the letter.

    You want to send a resume, two pages at most. Most recent activity at the top. Also, send a brief cover letter with it, and indicate in that what kind of job you think you would be most suited for and when you would be available. Punch up any interesting skills or experience. Taylor it to the specific industry or company. Google up those companies and see what kind of work they do. Such homework is important for the interview. Know the company you are applying to so you can look good when they ask "why do you want to work for <this company>?"

    When you get an interview the key is to show you are going to be an asset to the company.

    If company "x" does not hire you, Google up all companies that do similar work and apply to them.

    Even in the current tough economy you should be able to get a job fairly quickly. And then you should be able to advance in any reasonable company.
     
  11. Dec 29, 2014 #10
    You're probably a more desirable engineer in the eyes of an employer. Nonetheless, you still have your knowledge (a better understanding of how the universe) to counter the notion of having wasted your time.
     
  12. Dec 29, 2014 #11

    Choppy

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Education Advisor

    In the spirit of constructive criticism, passing off a double major as having completed two independent degrees in your job search is likely not doing you any favours. Nor is the attitude that completing a degree in physics "does nothing in terms of finding jobs."

    Studying physics at the undergraduate level educates you in physics and prepares you for further advanced studies in physics. It doesn't give you any professional qualifications because it's not a professional degree. Very few people look to hire physics majors specifically, because the there are no legal requirements for physicists to perform certain actions, nor does a physics degree come with a skill set that has a specific industrial application. Mechanical engineering on the other hand is a professional degree. Completing such a program qualifies you to enter the profession and is a step in the process to getting you to the point where your signature can allow a corporation to safely move through a production process.

    What I have seen with physics majors though is that they tend to excel in other professions once they have their foot in the door. I don't know if that is because the physics degree gives them special skills that transfer well such as general problem solving, or if you just have a group of talented problem-solvers who chose to study physics in the first place. I suspect a lot can depend on the specifics of the individuals and the programs they've gone through. Getting your foot in the door is only one aspect of a career.
     
  13. Dec 30, 2014 #12
    Well I think the takeaway from the feedback you guys are giving me is that an effective strategy would be to have my engineering degree as my primary asset with my physics degree supplementing it. This is actually the strategy I used when I applied for graduate school and I guess maybe I could apply it to the job hunt as well.
     
  14. Dec 31, 2014 #13

    CWatters

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    I recommend rewriting/tuning your CV to suit the job you are applying for rather than sending out the same CV each time.

    Quite a few years back I did a lot of interviewing for graduate electronics engineers. I shouldn't generalise but I got the impression many of those that had done a second degree didn't really want to be in engineering. It was frequently apparent at interview that most really wanted a research job and were only applying for the jobs we were offering because they had failed to get a place on a PhD course. Pure research jobs were/are like gold dust. If that describes you then try not to let it show at interview!
     
  15. Dec 31, 2014 #14
    Well I got both my degrees concurrently. But I think the general strategy (both proposed in this thread and also the strategy I used for applying to grad schools) was to present myself as an engineer primarily with the additional knowledge and skills given by a physics degree. I think that makes the most sense. If you have any feedback to that let me know but it seems to be the best strategy available.
     
  16. Dec 31, 2014 #15
    I would consider leaving the physics degree off completely. That is how I got my first job out of college.
     
  17. Dec 31, 2014 #16
    Can you elaborate more on your situation?
     
  18. Dec 31, 2014 #17
    Briefly... I got a degree in physics, couldn't get a job. I got a masters in physics, still couldn't get a job. I left physics off my resume/application and finally got a minimum wage job. I went back to school for engineering and then get a job as an engineer.

    Its just something I would consider, leaving physics off. It might help a little, it might hurt a little. Since you have a real engineering degree on your resume I don't think having physics on there would help you much. Maybe try it both ways and cover your bases.
     
  19. Jan 1, 2015 #18
    I thought it would be silly to leave off a degree. But I can kind of see that for jobs you are obviously overqualified for, the company must know that they can't offer you your dream job, meaning you will be gone as soon as said dream job opportunity comes along.

    So the strategy would be to get a job just to get job experience, you leave off the physics degree.

    Same would be true for PhDs. Maybe it is best to leave it off for lower tier jobs. I can see that the only thing an employer gets from additional MSc or PhD is that you will be gone once a pure research job opportunity comes up.

    Once you have job experience and can apply for more desirable jobs, surely the time spend on an additional degree would not be wasted.
    But, if you do an engineering job for 10 years, meaning you do nothing with your physics degree, maybe it starts to lose value over time?
     
  20. Jan 1, 2015 #19

    Astronuc

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor

    I started in physics (nuclear and astro) and migrated into nuclear engineering. A physics background was very useful in NE. In fact, I encourage engineering students to get as much physics as possible, since engineering is more or less applied physics. If I had known then what I know now, I would have doubled majored in physics and nuclear engineering. I really didn't have any guidance until later years as an undergrad, so I more or less stumbled through the first few years.

    With regard to mechanical engineering and physics, in what areas did one specialize? Both areas have many specialty sub-disciplines.

    Was one a student member of ASME? That is a great way to learn about careers in mechanical engineering. www.asme.org
    http://jobboard.asme.org/
    https://www.asme.org/career-education/early-career-engineers



    One could also look at MS or PhD in Engineering Physics.

    Why entertain non-STEM jobs? One seems unsure about a career in STEM for which one is trained? In what career is one interested.


    That is a reasonable strategy.

    Those options are not necessarily less realistic. DOE labs generally prefer to hire folks with MS or PhD. They are mainly interested in exceptional people who have demonstrated the ability to do research. Capability, competency and proficiency are important.
     
    Last edited: Jan 1, 2015
  21. Jan 1, 2015 #20
    On the mechanical engineering side of things I took advanced coursework in nuclear reactor engineering and also in heat transfer. I also did research on a thermal fluids topic. For physics I basically just took the classes to be honest. I guess it is reasonable then to properly conclude that ME is my greater strength than physics.

    At one point I was interest in fusion energy and other plasma physics topics but no longer. Just playing to my strengths and where I've actually had experience in developing my interests. I'm mostly looking to do something with fission reactor engineering in a thermal fluids topic like perhaps something involving CFD, heat transfer, or a multiphysics simulation of sorts.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook