Dielectric Boundary Condition Question

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the boundary conditions for a dielectric material in a static electric field. It highlights the equation relating the normal components of the electric fields inside and outside the dielectric, specifically k∂Φ/∂n_i = ∂Φ/∂n_e, where k is the dielectric constant. The boundary condition is also presented as ε_1 E^⊥_1 - ε_2 E^⊥_2 = σ_q, with σ_q representing surface charge density. The explanation for these conditions is linked to Gauss's law and the use of a "pillbox" surface for analysis. Overall, the conversation clarifies the mathematical relationships governing electric fields at dielectric boundaries.
Apteronotus
Messages
201
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I have a question regarding the boundary condition present for a dielectric immersed in a static field. I hope one of you physics guru's can shed some light on this.

Suppose we have a dielectric in space subjected to some external static electric field.

I have read (without explanation) that at the boundary of the dielectric the potential \Phi satisfies

<br /> k\frac{\partial \Phi}{\partial n_i} = \frac{\partial \Phi}{\partial n_e} <br />

where \frac{\partial}{\partial n} represent the derivatives along the outward unit normal just interior, i, and just exterior, e, of the dielectric and k is the dielectric constant.

can anyone shed some light on why this is so?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The equation relates the normal component of the electric fields on either side of the boundary
<br /> \frac{\partial \Phi}{\partial x} = -E_x<br />

The boundary condition is

\epsilon_1 E^\perp_1 - \epsilon_2 E^\perp_1 = \sigma_q

where \sigma_q is the charge density on the surface.

This can be shown by using Gauss's law with a "pillbox" surface.

http://www.scribd.com/doc/136393324/27/Boundary-conditions-for-perpendicular-field-components

This corresponds to your equation when \frac{\epsilon_i}{\epsilon_e} = k and \sigma_q = 0
 
Last edited:
MisterX you are amazing!
I am grateful. Thank you.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top