DiffEq, Binomial Expansion and limits

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around demonstrating that the functions U(x) = −√x − 1 and L(x) = −√x satisfy the funnel condition, which states that U(x) − L(x) approaches 0 as x approaches infinity. The participants are exploring algebraic methods to show this relationship, particularly through the use of binomial expansion and limits.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Some participants suggest using binomial expansion to analyze the difference U(x) − L(x), while others question the appropriateness of this method for the given functions. There is also discussion about the epsilon-delta definition of limits as an alternative approach.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with participants sharing their attempts and reasoning. Some have provided algebraic manipulations and expressed uncertainty about the validity of their methods. Others have suggested different approaches, including epsilon-delta proofs, indicating a productive exploration of the problem.

Contextual Notes

Participants express confusion about the scope of "using algebra" as specified in the homework prompt, leading to varied interpretations of acceptable methods. There is also mention of potential limitations in their understanding of epsilon-delta proofs.

QuietMind
Messages
42
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


Use algebra to show that U(x) = −√x − 1 and L(x) = −√x satisfy the ’funnel condition’ U(x) − L(x) → 0 as x → ∞

Homework Equations


Funnel condition: The two fences come together asymptotically, i.e. U(x) − L(x) is small for large x.

The Attempt at a Solution


I think that the binomial expansion is appropriate here? But I am unclear if it can be used for fractions.

##U(x)-L(x) = -\sqrt{x-1} +\sqrt{x} ##
the first term can be expressed as: (hopefully did the binomial right)
## x^\frac{1}{2} - \frac{1}{2}x^\frac{-1}{2}- \frac{1}{8}x^\frac{-3}{2}...##

so then
##-\sqrt{x-1} +\sqrt{x} = x^\frac{1}{2} -x^\frac{1}{2} + \frac{1}{2}x^\frac{-1}{2} + \frac{1}{8}x^\frac{-3}{2}... ##
the first 2 terms cancel, then the rest go to 0 as x goes to infinity. Does that look right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
QuietMind said:

Homework Statement


Use algebra to show that U(x) = −√x − 1 and L(x) = −√x satisfy the ’funnel condition’ U(x) − L(x) → 0 as x → ∞

Homework Equations


Funnel condition: The two fences come together asymptotically, i.e. U(x) − L(x) is small for large x.

The Attempt at a Solution


I think that the binomial expansion is appropriate here? But I am unclear if it can be used for fractions.

##U(x)-L(x) = -\sqrt{x-1} +\sqrt{x} ##
the first term can be expressed as: (hopefully did the binomial right)
## x^\frac{1}{2} - \frac{1}{2}x^\frac{-1}{2}- \frac{1}{8}x^\frac{-3}{2}...##

so then
##-\sqrt{x-1} +\sqrt{x} = x^\frac{1}{2} -x^\frac{1}{2} + \frac{1}{2}x^\frac{-1}{2} + \frac{1}{8}x^\frac{-3}{2}... ##
the first 2 terms cancel, then the rest go to 0 as x goes to infinity. Does that look right?

Yes.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: QuietMind
QuietMind said:
8x−32...−x−1+x=x12−x12+12x−12+18x−32...-\sqrt{x-1} +\sqrt{x} = x^\frac{1}{2} -x^\frac{1}{2} + \frac{1}{2}x^\frac{-1}{2} + \frac{1}{8}x^\frac{-3}{2}...
the first 2 terms cancel, then the rest go to 0 as x goes to infinity. Does that look right?
That's a little shaky. You have an infinite sum of terms each of which tends to zero. That's not quite the same as the sum tending to zero.
Also, are you sure you are permitted to lean on the binomial expansion here?
It is quite easy, and perhaps more instructive, to get the result from a simple epsilon-delta proof. I.e. given ε > 0, find xε such that x > xε implies etc.
 
I have no idea what's allowed. The question just says "use algebra" so I took binomial expansion as being part of the bag of tricks. Any other ideas what "use algebra" entails?

I have very little experience with epsilon delta proofs but I looked them up and will give it a try:

Want to prove this
Expression1: ##\lim_{x\rightarrow +\infty}{\sqrt{x}-\sqrt{x-1}} = 0##

given ## \epsilon > 0##

I looked up the procedure for when the limit approaches infinity, and they say the first step is to work backwards from this:
Expression2: ## \epsilon > |-\sqrt{x-1} + \sqrt{x}-0| ##

, and try to express x in terms of epsilon. Is that a good first step? Here's my work:

multiplying both sides by the sum of the squareroots, and getting rid of abs values, yields
##(\sqrt{x} + \sqrt{x-1})\epsilon > 1##
##(\sqrt{x} + \sqrt{x-1}) > \frac{1}{\epsilon}##
Adding this expression to the original Expression 2 (adding the greater than side to the greater than side to preserve inequality) yields:
##\epsilon + \sqrt{x} + \sqrt{x-1} > \frac{1}{\epsilon} + \sqrt{x} - \sqrt{x-1}##

Chug through algebra to get:
Expression 3: ##x > \frac{1}{4}*(\frac{1}{\epsilon}-\epsilon)^2 + 1##

And then it tells me to start from expression 3, and re-derive expression 2 to formally constitute the proof, which I have trouble doing (the step where I add 2 inequalities together seems irreversible). Am I way off base?
 
QuietMind said:
I have no idea what's allowed. The question just says "use algebra" so I took binomial expansion as being part of the bag of tricks. Any other ideas what "use algebra" entails?

I have very little experience with epsilon delta proofs but I looked them up and will give it a try:

Want to prove this
Expression1: ##\lim_{x\rightarrow +\infty}{\sqrt{x}-\sqrt{x-1}} = 0##

given ## \epsilon > 0##

I looked up the procedure for when the limit approaches infinity, and they say the first step is to work backwards from this:
Expression2: ## \epsilon > |-\sqrt{x-1} + \sqrt{x}-0| ##

, and try to express x in terms of epsilon. Is that a good first step? Here's my work:

multiplying both sides by the sum of the squareroots, and getting rid of abs values, yields
##(\sqrt{x} + \sqrt{x-1})\epsilon > 1##
##(\sqrt{x} + \sqrt{x-1}) > \frac{1}{\epsilon}##
Adding this expression to the original Expression 2 (adding the greater than side to the greater than side to preserve inequality) yields:
##\epsilon + \sqrt{x} + \sqrt{x-1} > \frac{1}{\epsilon} + \sqrt{x} - \sqrt{x-1}##

Chug through algebra to get:
Expression 3: ##x > \frac{1}{4}*(\frac{1}{\epsilon}-\epsilon)^2 + 1##

And then it tells me to start from expression 3, and re-derive expression 2 to formally constitute the proof, which I have trouble doing (the step where I add 2 inequalities together seems irreversible). Am I way off base?

You could also use the fact that ##F(x) = \sqrt{x-1} - \sqrt{x}## can be re-written as
F(x) = \frac{( \sqrt{x-1} - \sqrt{x}) ( \sqrt{x-1} + \sqrt{x})}{ \sqrt{x-1} + \sqrt{x}} = \frac{-1}{ \sqrt{x-1} + \sqrt{x}},
and that really is "algebra". In this last form you do not have "cancellation", so it is easier to deal with the small differences between ##\sqrt{x-1}## and ##\sqrt{x}##.
 
Last edited:
QuietMind said:
##(\sqrt{x} + \sqrt{x-1}) > \frac{1}{\epsilon}##
Down to there was fine (indeed, very good). The next step is to find a condition like "x> some function of epsilon" which ensures that statement is true. There's no need to be precious about finding the finest such condition. E.g. if √(x-1)>a, what can you say about √x in relation to a?
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 105 ·
4
Replies
105
Views
11K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K