Difference between EE and Physics E&M?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion explores the differences between the electromagnetism (E&M) curricula for Electrical Engineering (EE) majors and Physics majors, focusing on the theoretical versus applied aspects of the subject as taught in different academic programs.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that EE majors may have a stronger emphasis on applied electromagnetism compared to Physics majors, who might focus more on theoretical concepts.
  • One participant provides detailed syllabi from their university, highlighting differences such as the focus on transmission line theory and waveguides in EE courses versus a more theoretical approach in Physics courses.
  • Another participant argues that the EE E&M curriculum is a "watered down" version of the Physics curriculum, indicating a perceived lack of depth in the EE program.
  • Some participants note that while EE undergraduates may not delve deeply into E&M, graduate studies in EE offer more comprehensive coverage of the subject.
  • There is mention of variability in course content based on different schools and professors, with some topics potentially being omitted due to time constraints.
  • One participant expresses that a Physics degree may lead to more opportunities for advanced studies, while an EE degree is seen as more job-oriented.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the depth and focus of E&M education in EE versus Physics programs. There is no consensus on whether one approach is superior to the other, as opinions vary based on individual experiences and institutional differences.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge that course syllabi may not fully represent the actual content covered in classes, and that the differences in curriculum can vary significantly between institutions.

zyj
Messages
24
Reaction score
0
I'm just wondering, but what sort of difference is there between the electromagnetism that Electrical Engineering majors learn and the electromagnetism that Physics majors learn?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm also interested in this. In the end, the EE will probably know more about electromagnetism (at least applied) than a general physicist. At my university, electrophysics both applied and theoretical are a subset field of EE.
 
I can give you an example for the school I am currently attending (University of Toronto)

Here is the syllabus for the third year EM course in Physics:

"Solving Poisson and Laplace equations via method of images and separation of variables, Multipole expansion for electrostatics, atomic dipoles and polarizability, polarization in dielectrics, Ampere and Biot-Savart laws, multipole expansion in magnetostatics, magnetic dipoles, magnetization in matter, Maxwell’s equations in matter."

Here is the syllabus for the fourth year EM course in Physics:

"Special Relativity, four-vector calculus and relativistic notation, the relativistic Maxwell’s Equations, electromagnetic waves in vacuum and conducting and non-conducting materials, electromagnetic radiation from point charges and systems of charges."

Here is the syllabus for the third year EM course in Engineering Science (EE/EngPhys):

"An introduction to transmission line theory: voltage and current waves, characteristic impedance, reflections from the load and source, transients on the line, Smith’s chart, impedance matching. Fundamentals of electromagnetic theory: Maxwell’s equations, Helmholtz’s theorem, time retarded scalar and vector potentials, gauges, boundary conditions, electric and magnetic fields wave equations and their solutions in lossless and lossy medium. Plane wave propagation, reflection and transmission at boundaries. Constitutive relations and dispersion. Radiating dipole and waveguides."

And here is the syllabus for the third year EM course in EE:

"Voltage and current waves on a general transmission line, reflections from the load and source, transients on the line, and Smith’s chart. Maxwell’s equations, electric and magnetic fields wave equations, boundary conditions, plane wave propagation, reflection and transmission at boundaries, constitutive relations, dispersion, polarization; Poynting vector; waveguides. "

*note that there is no 4th year EE pure EM courses


So if you notice, there is a heavy emphasis on transmission line theory and waveguides in engineering disciplines, which makes sense. Physics usually offers a much more theoretical approach, whereas engineering is much more applied. So there is a difference. Unless you want to do pure theory in graduate school, you should be fine taking either version of the course.

That said, it differs a lot between schools and professors also. Often the syllabi include things which are never even close to being covered due to time constraints. Most often the biggest differences between the courses are the things that get left toward the end, ie. the specialties such as applications and whatnot. Other than that EM will always be EM no matter what way you slice it.
 
The EE E&M is an extremely watered down version of the physics E&M, by the end of the year I will have taken both and from reading just griffiths e&m in preparation for wangness which I've also read through there is no comparison.
 
You wouldn't go deep into anything in EE undergrad including E&M. But EE does have E&M research area. In EE graduate school, you will learn deeper E&M.

I believe the purpose of EE undergrad degree is to get you a job not lead you into further research studies. On other hands, you will find it hard to get a job after Physics degree. But, you will be in good shape to go further into higher studies even in EE.
 
The graduate level EE E&M course I took (kind of a graduate level overview of EE EM) was a combination of the syllabus nicholls posted for the third year EM course in Physics and the third year EM course in Engineering Science (EE/EngPhys).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K