Difference between frame of reference and coordinate system?

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
8 replies · 2K views
toesockshoe
Messages
265
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


Our teacher said we can NEVER do an F=ma problem from an accelerating, or noninertial frame. (He said there are ways to do it, but we can not do it in his class), and I'm confused because often times he makes the "system" or makes a "free-body diagram" around an accelerating object. Today he showed as an easy problem, but I thought it uses an accelerating frame. Here is the problem:

There is an elevator and there is a bathroom scale with a block with mass 3kg that sits on top of the scale on the bottom of the elevator. The scale reads 40N. There is another scale (a fish scale) that is attached from the ceiling to the block and that reads 20N. Find the magnitude and direction of the elevators acceleration.

Homework Equations


F=ma

The Attempt at a Solution



F=ma
choose positive y in coordinate system to go downward
-FT+Fg-FN=ma
-FT+mg-FN=ma
a=(mg-FT-FN)/m
plug in values, ((3)(10)-20-40)/3=-10m/s/s... (we assumed gravity is 10 downward),

b/c C.S. is going downward the elevator is accelearing upward at 10 m/s/s.

but isn't hte mass accelerating? how can that be the system?
[/B]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
toesockshoe said:

F=ma
choose positive y in coordinate system to go downward
-FT+Fg-FN=ma
-FT+mg-FN=ma
a=(mg-FT-FN)/m
plug in values, ((3)(10)-20-40)/3=-10m/s/s... (we assumed gravity is 10 downward),

b/c C.S. is going downward the elevator is accelearing upward at 10 m/s/s.

but isn't hte mass accelerating? how can that be the system?
Seems to me that the frame used is inertial, not a frame tied to the accelerating mass. I can't understand why you think it is.
 
haruspex said:
Seems to me that the frame used is inertial, not a frame tied to the accelerating mass. I can't understand why you think it is.
ok so what is the frame in this situation?
 
toesockshoe said:
ok so what is the frame in this situation?
You mean frame of reference. It is the Earth. You see the lift, the block in it, and the scales, from the ground. All accelerate together, and the acceleration of the block is determined by the sum of forces: gravity, the normal force from the bathroom scale and T tension from the fish scale.

In the frame of reference fixed to the lift, the block would be in rest (with respect to the lift) .
 
ehild said:
You mean frame of reference. It is the Earth. You see the lift, the block in it, and the scales, from the ground. All accelerate together, and the acceleration of the block is determined by the sum of forces: gravity, the normal force from the bathroom scale and T tension from the fish scale.

In the frame of reference fixed to the lift, the block would be in rest (with respect to the lift) .
oh ok. got it. correct me if I am wrong: Forces acting on an object are the same in ALL frames of references but the only difference may be in the acceleration of the object right?
 
The forces are equal in all inertial frame of reference.
In non-inertial frames of reference there are additional fictitious forces, causing acceleration of the object. Such force push you back in an accelerating car.
 
ehild said:
The forces are equal in all inertial frame of reference.
In non-inertial frames of reference there are additional fictitious forces, causing acceleration of the object. Such force push you back in an accelerating car.
ok but excluding pseudo forces (our teacher said we can't use them), would all the forces be the same but the only difference is the acceleration right>
 
The "real" forces are the same, but the acceleration is different. Use only inertial frames of reference, where Newton's Laws apply. Do not worry, what happens in a non-inertial one.