Difference between gyroscope angular displacement and Euler angles

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the differences between gyroscope angular displacement and Euler angles, particularly in the context of aviation and inertial navigation systems. Participants explore the implications of these concepts in understanding orientation and rotation in three-dimensional space.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the relationship between gyroscope output for angular displacement and the necessity of using Euler angles for flight, indicating a desire to understand the distinction.
  • Another participant explains that gyroscopes provide rotation rates rather than total displacement, emphasizing the need to integrate these rates to track angles and interpret them in terms of Euler angles.
  • A different participant introduces the concept of Direction Cosine Matrices (DCM) and raises questions about converting body-frame to inertial-frame, suggesting this is crucial for determining displacement relative to the inertial frame.
  • Further elaboration on the various coordinate systems used in Inertial Navigation Systems (INS) is provided, highlighting the importance of understanding gravity's direction and the Earth's rotation for accurate gyro readings.
  • One participant expresses gratitude for the insights shared, indicating that they have processed the information and found clarity in the discussion.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants present multiple competing views and questions regarding the relationship between gyroscope angular displacement and Euler angles, as well as the complexities of inertial navigation systems. The discussion remains unresolved with no consensus reached.

Contextual Notes

The discussion touches on various coordinate systems and the mathematical complexities involved in inertial navigation, but does not resolve the specific assumptions or definitions that underlie the participants' claims.

ZekDe
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi guys, I'm trying to understand between gyroscope angular displacement and euler angles?
for example { Δx = Δx + h * Rx * SCx);} this is gyroscope output about anguler displacement.This value can be used to determine angle that
device created.Why we should euler angles to fly.(I know quaternions.I just try to understand the difference)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Gyroscopes on airplanes are usually hard-mounted on the frame and give you the rotation rates, not the total displacement. The rates are integrated external to the gyroscope hardware to keep track of the angles.
As an airplane rolls, pitches, and yaws, a particular gyroscope angular rate represents rotations in different directions. It is necessary to keep track of the airplane orientation to know how the gyroscope rates should be interpreted in Euler angles.
 
Last edited:
What about DCM,firstly we need to convert body-frame to inertial-frame.What is the purpose?.it that how degree we got displacement according to inertial-frame?
 
There are a lot of coordinate systems used in an Inertial Navigation System (INS): INS mount, body-frame, locally-level, Earth-Centered-Earth-Fixed (ECEF), Latitude Longitude Altitude (LLA). And there is a reason for each one. For one thing, body-frame coordinates wouldn't tell the airplane which way gravity is pointing, which is important for interpreting the accelerometer measurements. For another thing, the rotation of the Earth shows up in modern gyro outputs, so it is necessary to know what direction that is into interpret the gyro readings. The mathematics of a modern INS is quite complicated. There are all sorts of Direction Cosine Matrices and integrals used. The long-term drift of the integrals is periodically corrected using fixes on known positions (these days, GPS inputs). The errors of the merged inputs are minimized using Kalman filters. So many of the inputs are communicated in different coordinate systems that DCMs are all over the place. I have not looked at it in detail, but this looks like a good simplified introduction (especially if you have access to MATLAB)
 
Last edited:
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: Klystron and anorlunda
FactChecker
thank you for your interest,I thought about it and solved the massy information in my mind.Excatly that is what did you say.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
7K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
54
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K