Difference between Lithium Ion and Nickel Metal Hydride

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the differences between Lithium Ion (Li-ion) and Nickel Metal Hydride (NiMH) batteries, particularly regarding their charging requirements. NiMH batteries are favored for their high charge density and do not necessitate a charge controller or voltage regulator, unlike Li-ion batteries which require precise charging protocols to prevent damage or hazards. Li-ion chargers operate by initially applying a small charge current, then transitioning to a constant current until reaching 4.2V, after which the current is reduced to maintain this voltage. The conversation highlights the importance of using appropriate charging methods to avoid battery failure or safety risks.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of battery chemistry, specifically Lithium Ion and Nickel Metal Hydride.
  • Knowledge of battery charging protocols and safety mechanisms.
  • Familiarity with voltage and current specifications in battery management.
  • Awareness of the risks associated with improper battery usage.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research "Li-ion battery charging protocols" to understand the specifics of voltage and current management.
  • Explore "NiMH battery characteristics" to compare with Li-ion technology.
  • Investigate "battery safety mechanisms" to learn about preventing hazards in battery usage.
  • Read "efficiency of battery chargers" to understand the impact of different charging methods on performance.
USEFUL FOR

Electronics engineers, battery technology researchers, and anyone involved in the design or application of rechargeable battery systems will benefit from this discussion.

Infinityze
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
Obviously there are MANY differences, but I'm curious about one in particular.

In an article I read, the creator used NiMH batteries because of their high charge density, but also because they do not require a charge controller and voltage regulator in the circuitry. Why is this, and is there any way a Lithium Ion battery can also function without a charge controller/voltage regulator?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Many modern batteries can be damaged if used incorrectly. Some (not commercial ones I hope) might even burn/explode.

The lithium ion battery has a problem of lithium metal build up at high current discharge. Lithium is a very reactive metal and can burn easily.

Disabling safety devices is dangerous/stupid/a no-no. That would include using a battery inappropriately.
 
Infinityze said:
In an article I read, the creator used NiMH batteries because of their high charge density, but also because they do not require a charge controller and voltage regulator in the circuitry.

is it a reliable source ?? for me that statement if false
all NiCds and Ni Metal Hydrides I have ever owned have timed charge controllers
 
davenn said:
is it a reliable source ?? for me that statement if false
all NiCds and Ni Metal Hydrides I have ever owned have timed charge controllers

It's from a peer reviewed journal entry, but it's ~10 years old.
 
A timed charge controller for a NiMH or NiCad battery is a totally different animal from a 3 phase charge system for Li-ion.

A li-ion charger starts with a small charge current until the battery reaches a low voltage threshold, then applies a constant current (usually 0.1C) until it reaches precisely 4.2V (+- 50mV), then maintains exactly 4.2V by progressively reducing the charge current until the current is below a "fully charged" threshold. Then the charger stops charging.

Too much current, or too high a current, then you damage the battery or it catches fire.
Not enough current, then it takes forever to charge.
Not enough voltage and it doesn't reach full charge.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Infinityze, Jeff Rosenbury and davenn
meBigGuy said:
A li-ion charger starts with a small charge current until the battery reaches a low voltage threshold, then applies a constant current (usually 0.1C) until it reaches precisely 4.2V (+- 50mV), then maintains exactly 4.2V by progressively reducing the charge current until the current is below a "fully charged" threshold. Then the charger stops charging.

The same article said that such a charge controller would take up a lot of power. Is there any information on exactly how much?
 
It's not good to reference articles without linking to them. It is very possible you are misunderstanding or mis quoting.

Read this:
http://www.digikey.com/en/articles/techzone/2012/sep/a-designers-guide-to-lithium-battery-charging

And then this:
http://www.ti.com/lit/ds/symlink/bq2000.pdfThe charger efficiency depends on how the charger is implemented. A linear current source (using a transistor to drop the voltage to the proper voltage to maintain the current) would waste power by the ratio of the source voltage to the battery voltage since all the voltage dropped across the pass transistor times the constant current would be wasted power. Chargers for other technologies have a similar issue if a wasteful linear controllers is used.

A switching regulator is pretty efficient.

As for the efficiency of the chemical process itself, I think it is pretty good in all cases since the battery doesn't heat up a lot, but I don't know the numbers off the top of my head.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: davenn

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
5K
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K