Difference between omega 0 and omega k

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter windy miller
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Difference Omega
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion clarifies the distinction between omega sub zero (Ω₀) and omega k (Ωₖ) in cosmology. Omega sub zero represents the total relative density of the universe at the present time (Ω₀ = Ω(t₀)), while omega k indicates the curvature of the universe, defined as Ωₖ = 1 - Ω. A spatially flat universe corresponds to Ωₖ = 0, which implies that Ω₀ equals 1. Different references may use varying notations, but the fundamental definitions remain consistent.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of cosmological density parameters
  • Familiarity with the concept of spatial curvature in cosmology
  • Knowledge of critical density in the context of the universe
  • Basic grasp of cosmological time notation (e.g., t₀)
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of Ωₖ = 1 - Ω in cosmological models
  • Study the role of critical density in determining the fate of the universe
  • Explore different cosmological notations and their meanings in literature
  • Investigate the significance of spatial curvature in the evolution of the universe
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, cosmologists, and students of physics who seek to deepen their understanding of the universe's structure and curvature parameters.

windy miller
Messages
306
Reaction score
28
As I try and read cosmology literature with the eyes of layman , I find two different terms that seem to represent the curvature ( or lack of) of the universe .
These are omega sub zero and omega k. But I can't see the difference between the two. Can anyone explain this?
 
Space news on Phys.org
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: windy miller
mathman said:
you may be confusing terms. \Omega is usually to represent the density of the universe, normalized so that = 1 means flat.

Yes, but ##\Omega_k## (not an actual mass/energy density) often is defined as ##\Omega_k = 1 - \Omega##, so that ##\Omega_k = 0## for a spatially flat universe.

I though that ##\Omega_0## usually means ##\Omega_0 = \Omega \left(t_0\right)##, i.e., ##\Omega_0## is the value of the total relative density right now, but I could be wrong. Also, different references can use different notations.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: windy miller
Interestingly in the
George Jones said:
Yes, but ##\Omega_k## (not an actual mass/energy density) often is defined as ##\Omega_k = 1 - \Omega##, so that ##\Omega_k = 0## for a spatially flat universe.

I though that ##\Omega_0## usually means ##\Omega_0 = \Omega \left(t_0\right)##, i.e., ##\Omega_0## is the value of the total relative density right now, but I could be wrong. Also, different references can use different notations.

I get the impression that omega k is the curvature so 0 means zero curvature, whereas omega sub zero is the ratio of the critical density to the actual density and so with zero curvature omega sub zero should be 1. Is that correct?
 
windy miller said:
I get the impression that omega k is the curvature so 0 means zero curvature, whereas omega sub zero is the ratio of the critical density to the actual density and so with zero curvature omega sub zero should be 1. Is that correct?

The ratio is the other way around, .i.e., ##\Omega## is the ratio of the actual density to the critical density. If the present time is ##t_0##, then ##\Omega_0 = \Omega\left(t_0\right)##, and if at time ##t_0## the universe is spatially flat, then, yes, ##\Omega_0 = 1##.
.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: windy miller

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 59 ·
2
Replies
59
Views
8K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 86 ·
3
Replies
86
Views
16K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
6K