Difference between Raman scattering and Rayleigh scattering

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion clarifies the distinctions between Raman scattering, Rayleigh scattering, and Brillouin scattering. Raman scattering involves inelastic interactions where a photon excites a molecule to a virtual electronic state, resulting in a photon emission of lesser energy, known as Stokes radiation. Rayleigh scattering is an elastic process where the energy of the absorbed photon equals that of the emitted photon, merely changing the light's direction. Brillouin scattering, influenced by phonons or magnetic fields, alters the index of refraction and results in frequency changes, although it is primarily a macroscopic phenomenon.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of molecular electronic states and vibrational states
  • Familiarity with the Franck-Condon principle
  • Knowledge of elastic vs. inelastic scattering processes
  • Basic concepts of phonons and their role in solid-state physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the Franck-Condon principle in detail
  • Explore the mathematical framework of Raman scattering
  • Investigate the role of phonons in Brillouin scattering
  • Learn about the relationship between refractive index and molecular interactions
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physical chemistry, chemical physics, and solid-state physics, as well as researchers interested in molecular scattering phenomena.

DanSandberg
Messages
31
Reaction score
0
Can someone qualitatively explain the difference between Raman scattering, Rayleigh scattering, and Brillouin Scattering with respect to molecules? I attempt to define each below but would appreciate either affirmation I'm correct or correction if I'm wrong.

Raman scattering - Molecules contain electronic states of energy. Within each electronic state there are vibrational states of energy. If a molecule in the ground electronic / ground vibrational state absorbs a photon and reaches an excited electronic state / excited vibrational state (likely the case due to Franck-Condon principle), the molecule will likely thermally relax to the excited electronic / ground vibrational state via a non-radiative process, i.e. internal conversion, and then emit a photon of lesser energy (stokes radiation).

Rayleigh scattering - Unlike Raman, its elastic. So the E of the photon absorbed equals the E of the photon emitted. Essentially, the only thing the molecule does is change the direction of propagation for the light.

Brillouin Scattering - (This one is the tough one) The presence of phonons (sound) or a magnetic field (magnons) or thermal gradients interrupts the "lattice" of particles or equilibrium distribution of particles and, in turn, affects the index of refraction. The result in a change of frequency.

Brillouin is the one I struggle with really. Doesn't the index of refraction merely change the direction of the light toward the normal of the surface? I'm thinking about it too simply, I know, but by what equation does index of refraction change the frequency of incident light? I've seen Rayleigh and Raman scattering described in terms of Brillouin scattering. Also, index of refraction is a more macroscopic property. What is going on at the atomic level in Brillouin scattering?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Well, your description of Raman is an entirely correct description.. of fluorescence!

The difference here is that Raman is an excitation to a 'virtual' electronic level. It doesn't exist, and the molecule is not in the 'excited' state for any observable amount of time. (It's really just an artifact of how it's calculated, like virtual particles in QFT) The molecule then relaxes back to either a lower or higher energy level (relative its original state) by emitting another photon. Vibrational relaxation don't really enter into it, as there's no time. Of course, the excited state the molecules is left in after raman scattering might undergo vibrational relaxation.

Since the timescale here is so short (much shorter than fluorescence, not to mention phosphorescence) the re-emitted photon can be viewed as the same photon, with a change in energy corresponding to the change in energy of the electronic levels. From that point-of-view, it's the elastic scattering of a photon off the molecule.

Rayleigh can be viewed as the same process as for Raman, only with no changes in the energy levels of the molecule, hence elastic scattering.

Brillouin scattering is indeed a more macroscopic property, but it is related. It wouldn't occur to me to describe Rayleigh or Raman in terms of Brillouin scattering since I'm a chemical physicist. (indeed, a student learning physical chemistry would typically learn all about the former two, but not Brillouin). It's a solid-state physicist point of view to try to describe molecular phenomena in terms of condensed matter phenomena rather than vice versa! :) It's a bit silly. What's the refractive index of a molecule?
 


Right - i knew that! Stupid mistake regarding the Raman, I wasn't fully awake yet.

In terms of the refractive index of a molecule, I'm not sure there is one. I suppose you could consider the wave equations for a photon and a phonon and try to extract the constructive/destructive interference but so far I'm not having much success with this. I'm going to keep at it and see if I can derive something to explain it quantum mechanically.
 


Ah, it was rhetorical really. There no meaningful way (to my knowledge) to define the index of refraction for a single molecule.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
13K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K