Difference between the Shapiro Delay and time dilation?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter dsaun777
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the distinction between the Shapiro Delay and time dilation, as articulated by physicist Irwin Shapiro in a podcast. The Shapiro Delay, a measure of light's deflection due to massive bodies like the sun, was first calculated in 1964, highlighting its dependence on the curvature of Schwarzschild spatial planes. The delay requires precise measurements of light travel time, which were only feasible with advancements in radar technology and space exploration in the 1960s. The lack of theoretical interest in General Relativity (GR) from the 1920s to the 1960s also contributed to the delayed discovery of the Shapiro Delay.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of General Relativity (GR)
  • Familiarity with the concept of light deflection
  • Knowledge of Schwarzschild geometry
  • Basic principles of radar technology and space exploration
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the mathematical foundations of General Relativity
  • Explore the principles of light deflection in gravitational fields
  • Study the historical development of radar technology in the 20th century
  • Investigate the role of pulsars in astrophysical measurements
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, astrophysicists, students of General Relativity, and anyone interested in the historical context of gravitational phenomena.

dsaun777
Messages
296
Reaction score
39
I recently listened to The Origins Podcast with Lawrence Krauss and he had on the 94 year old physicist Irwin Shapiro. It was interesting and went into some of the details regarding the history of his work. In it he brings up how he first calculated what we now call the Shapiro Delay. It is a measure of light's deflection caused by a large mass such as the sun. It sounds very similar to time dilation. Does anyone here know the difference between the Shapiro Delay and time dilation and why it was only in 1964 that was discovered? It seems like a natural deduction from GR.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's more than just time dilation; it's measurably affected by the curvature of Schwarzschild spatial planes.

Why it wasn't thought of before is an imponderable. But there are a number of factors that may be relevant.

People tend to think in terms of tests you can do. To measure Shapiro delay you need to measure flight time, which depends on knowing the launch time of the light. The only ways I can think of doing it is radar (low power sets were developed in World War II), sending a space probe to the far side of the Sun (space exploration took off in the 1960s), or tracking pulsars (not discovered until the 1960s). It couldn't have been done much before it was. In fact, the radar set they tested it with was built in the early 60s, so may have stimulated research itself (people were looking for applications for it).

Also, I seem to recall that there was relatively little theoretical interest in GR between the 1920s and the 1960s, when there was a resurgence because new mathematical tools were brought to bear. So maybe there just wasn't much work in that field.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: dsaun777 and Nugatory

Similar threads

  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
22K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K