Difference: mean velocity & modulus of mean velocity vector

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the concepts of mean velocity and the modulus of the mean velocity vector in the context of circular motion. Participants are examining the definitions and differences between these terms as presented in a physics problem from Irodov's book.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the definitions of mean velocity and mean speed, questioning whether the terms are used interchangeably in the problem. There is discussion about how displacement and distance traveled relate to these definitions.

Discussion Status

Several participants are actively engaging in clarifying the terminology and implications of the problem. Some have provided insights into the calculations and assumptions regarding tangential acceleration, while others are questioning the interpretations of the terms used in the problem statement.

Contextual Notes

There is an ongoing debate about the definitions of mean velocity and mean speed, as well as the implications of assuming constant tangential acceleration. Participants note that the problem does not explicitly state certain conditions, leading to varied interpretations.

Pushoam
Messages
961
Reaction score
53

Homework Statement



upload_2017-7-18_21-33-34.png


Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
A)

Mean velocity is defined as <v> = total distance traveled/ total time taken = πR/Γ = 0.5 m/s

B) How is part a) different from part b)?

I think what Irodov means by mean velocity is mean speed in part a.
It is mean speed which is defined as <v> = total distance traveled/ total time taken .

In part b,
<v> is defined as <v> = total displacement traveled/ total time taken in the direction of total displacement
|<v>| = R/Γ = 0.32 m/s

Have I understood the difference between mean velocity and modulus of mean velocity vector properly?

How to calculate part c?
 

Attachments

  • upload_2017-7-18_20-55-5.png
    upload_2017-7-18_20-55-5.png
    20.4 KB · Views: 735
Physics news on Phys.org
I am not sure about this terminology, either. But if you go halfway around the circle, your displacement will be the diameter of the circle, not the radius.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: GrimReaper
Pushoam said:
I think what Irodov means by mean velocity is mean speed in part a.
I think he means what he says -- mean velocity. Which is a vector.
Part B is then trivial -- take the magnitude of the vector.
Part C...

The question implies that it does not matter what tangential acceleration is as long as it is constant. So cheat and assume that tangential acceleration is zero.
 
scottdave said:
But if you go halfway around the circle, your displacement will be the diameter of the circle, not the radius.
Yes, I calculated that way , but didn't write 2 before R. Thanks for pointing it out.
So, |<v>| = 2R/Γ = 0.32 m/s
 
Pushoam said:
Mean velocity is defined as <v> = total distance traveled/ total time taken
I'm unsure whether you are saying that is how you believe it is defined or how Irodov defines it.
Distance traveled is generally taken to be the integral of a scalar, ##\int |\vec {ds}|##. Dividing that by ##\Delta t## gives average speed.
The integral ##\int\vec{ds}## gives the displacement, a vector. Dividing that by ##\Delta t## gives the average velocity.
 
haruspex said:
I'm unsure whether you are saying that is how you believe it is defined or how Irodov defines it.
This is how I believe it is defined.

But, even if I take
<v> = ## \frac {\int |\vec {ds}|} {Δt} ##,

How will I calculate ## \int |\vec {ds}|## ?

I have to take ## \int |\vec {ds}| ## as total distance traveled in the time Γ.

So, how does this formulation make a difference?
 
Pushoam said:
This is how I believe it is defined.
Then you are wrong.
The question asks for average velocity, which is ## <\vec v>=\frac {\int \vec {ds}} {Δt} = \frac {\vec r(t_0+\Delta t)-\vec r(t_0)}{\Delta t}##, where ##vec r = \vec r(t)## is the vector position. ##\vec r(t_0+\Delta t)-\vec r(t_0)## is the displacement.
What is the displacement in this case?
Pushoam said:
But, even if I take
<v> = ## \frac {\int |\vec {ds}|} {Δt} ##
As I wrote, that is average speed. In the present case, ##\int |\vec {ds}|=\pi R##.
Pushoam said:
B) How is part a) different from part b)?
It is a bit odd, but part b seems to be asking for the magnitude of the vector found in part a.
 
haruspex said:
Then you are wrong.
The question asks for average velocity,

I am using Irodov's book.
And I feel that by the term" mean velocity", Irodov means "mean speed "and by the term "mean velocity vector", he means "mean velocity".
You can read the question for reference.
Assuming that the mean velocity is mean speed, Is what I wrote correct?
 
Pushoam said:
I feel that by the term" mean velocity", Irodov means "mean speed "
Ah, I see. He writes v for ##|\vec v|## and v for ##\vec v##. Then yes, qn a is asking for mean speed and your answer is correct.
 
  • #10
For part c,

Taking the constant tangent acceleration to be 0,⇒ speed is constant ⇒ mean speed = instantaneous speed

<w> =( vf - vi )/ Δt
= (v##\hat y## - v## (-\hat y##))/10 = 2*0.5/10 = 0.1 m/s2 ##\hat y##
| <w>| = 0.1 m/s2

But, how to show that this is true for any constant tangent acceleration?
 
Last edited:
  • #11
Pushoam said:
Taking the constant tangent acceleration to be 0,⇒ speed is constant ⇒ mean speed = instantaneous speed
I suspect the question intends that it starts from rest, so the tangential acceleration is not zero.
 
  • #12
haruspex said:
I suspect the question intends that it starts from rest, so the tangential acceleration is not zero.

It is not said so in the question.
Nonetheless, I will try to solve it for non-zero constant tangent acceleration.
 
  • #13
Taking the constant tangent acceleration to be c.
speed v = ct + vi
<v> = (1/τ)∫0τ(ct + vi)dt
= (cτ/2) + vi) = 0.5 m/s
<w> =( vf - vi )/ Δt
= [ (ct + vi)##\hat y## - vi(- ##\hat y##)]/t

Taking vi =0,
cτ/2 = 0.5 m/s
So,| <w> |= c = 0.1 m/s2

How to solve it with non - zero vi?

<v> = (cτ/2) + vi = 0.5 m/s
2 vi = 0.1 - cτ
|<w> | = [ ct + 2 vi]/τ = 0.1 m/s2Is this correct?
 
  • #14
haruspex said:
I suspect the question intends that it starts from rest, so the tangential acceleration is not zero.
Thinking about it some more, that assumption is unnecessary.
Pushoam said:
Taking the constant tangent acceleration to be c.
speed v = ct + vi
<v> = (1/τ)∫0τ(ct + vi)dt
= (cτ/2) + vi) = 0.5 m/s
<w> =( vf - vi )/ Δt
= [ (ct + vi)##\hat y## - vi(- ##\hat y##)]/t

Taking vi =0,
cτ/2 = 0.5 m/s
So,| <w> |= c = 0.1 m/s2

How to solve it with non - zero vi?

<v> = (cτ/2) + vi = 0.5 m/s
2 vi = 0.1 - cτ
|<w> | = [ ct + 2 vi]/τ = 0.1 m/s2Is this correct?
Your method has found the constant tangential acceleration, but that is a scalar. The question (this time) clearly defines the acceleration sought as a vector.
Suppose the initial speed is vi in the positive x direction. What is the final speed, and in what direction? What is the change in velocity?
 
  • #15
haruspex said:
Your method has found the constant tangential acceleration, but that is a scalar. The question (this time) clearly defines the acceleration sought as a vector.
The question asks for constant tangent acceleration.
I am using Irodov's book.
And I feel that by the term"constant tangent acceleration ", Irodov means "magnitude of constant tangent acceleration "and by the term "constant tangent acceleration vector", he means "constant tangent acceleration".
You can read the question for reference.
Assuming that the constant tangent acceleration is magnitude of constant tangent acceleration, Is what I wrote correct?

Please, see post #8 and 9.
Even if you take constant tangent acceleration to be a vector, then this vector can't be constant as tangential direction itself goes on changing.
So, by constant tangent acceleration, what Irodov means is the magnitude of the tangent acceleration is constant.

Because of this acceleration, the speed will go on changing.
So, I have to calculate final speed.
Now, the direction of final velocity is opposite to the direction of the initial velocity. This is what I have donein #13.
haruspex said:
Suppose the initial speed is vi in the positive x direction. What is the final speed, and in what direction? What is the change in velocity?

I have calculated it.
Pushoam said:
<w> =( vf - vi )/ Δt
= [ (ct + vi)##\hat y## - vi(- ##\hat y##)]/t
 
  • #16
Pushoam said:
The question asks for constant tangent acceleration.
No it doesn't.
It tells you the tangent acceleration, ##\frac{d|\vec v|}{dt}##, is constant, but asks for modulus of the average total acceleration, ##|\frac{\vec{\Delta v}}{\Delta t}|##

Pushoam said:
<w> =( vf - vi )/ Δt
##= [ (ct + v_i)\hat y - v_i(- \hat y)]/t##
Ok, but the distance and time information you are given creates a relationship between vi and c. Try eliminating one from that expression.
 
  • #17
haruspex said:
No it doesn't.
Sorry, what I meant by
Pushoam said:
The question asks for constant tangent acceleration.
is that the question tells to take constant tangent acceleration.
haruspex said:
but asks for modulus of the average total acceleration, |##\frac{\vec{\Delta v}}{\Delta t}##|
This is what I have calculated.
Isn't |##\frac{\vec{\Delta v}}{\Delta t}##| = <w> =( vf - vi )/ Δt
= [ (ct + vi)##\hat y ## - vi(- ##\hat y##) ]/t, Here t corresponds to Δt?
 
  • #18
Pushoam said:
Sorry, what I meant by

is that the question tells to take constant tangent acceleration.

This is what I have calculated.
Isn't |##\frac{\vec{\Delta v}}{\Delta t}##| = <w> =( vf - vi )/ Δt
= [ (ct + vi)##\hat y ## - vi(- ##\hat y##) ]/t, Here t corresponds to Δt?
Sorry, I edited my previous post in parallel with your last post. Please see my edit.
 
  • #19
haruspex said:
Ok, but the distance and time information you are given creates a relationship between vi and c. Try eliminating one from that expression.
I have done it in #13.
Pushoam said:
<v> = (cτ/2) + vi = 0.5 m/s
2 vi = 0.1 - cτ
|<w> | = [ ct + 2 vi]/τ = 0.1 m/s2
 
  • #20
Pushoam said:
I have done it in #13.
I'm very sorry, I didn't read it carefully enough.
I saw
Pushoam said:
How to solve it with non - zero vi?
and mistakenly assumed you had not found a way.
Yes, your answer in post #13 is fine.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Pushoam

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
40
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
4K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
26
Views
4K
Replies
23
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K