I can't find the source of this statement now, but I've been trying to prove that(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

[tex]\overline{A}\setminus\overline{B} \subseteq \overline{A\setminus B}.[/tex]

Now [itex]x\in\overline{A}\setminus\overline{B}[/itex] means x is in every closed superset of A but there exists a closed superset of B that doesn't contain x, whereas [itex]x\in \overline{A\setminus B}[/itex] means x is in every closed set that contains every point of A that's not also in B.

I've tried various manipulations involving equivalent definitions of closure, but have yet to find any obvious way to proceed. Any hints?

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Dismiss Notice

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Difference of closures is subset of closure of difference

Loading...

Similar Threads for Difference closures subset | Date |
---|---|

I If A is an algebra, then its uniform closure is an algebra. | Dec 26, 2017 |

I Integration of Legendre Polynomials with different arguments | Jun 17, 2017 |

I Difference between holomoprhic and analytic functions | May 31, 2017 |

I Difference between complex and real analysis | May 26, 2017 |

I Difference between tensor and vector? | Feb 27, 2017 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**