Differentiability and Continuity at a point

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the differentiability and continuity of a function \( g(x) = x^\alpha \cos(1/x^2) \) at the point \( x = 0 \). Participants explore the conditions under which \( g'(0) \) exists and whether \( g(x) \) is continuously differentiable at that point, particularly focusing on the parameter \( \alpha \).

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Some participants attempt to show that \( g'(0) = 0 \) and question the values of \( \alpha \) that allow this condition to hold, suggesting \( \alpha > 0 \). Others raise concerns about the limit existing for \( 0 < \alpha \leq 1 \) and discuss the implications of \( \alpha \) on the continuity of \( g'(x) \). There is also a discussion on the interpretation of "continuously differentiable" and its implications for the function's behavior around \( x = 0 \.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing insights and clarifications on the conditions for differentiability and continuity. Some guidance has been offered regarding the interpretation of limits and the implications of different values of \( \alpha \), but no consensus has been reached on the exact conditions required for \( g(x) \) to be continuously differentiable.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the constraints of a homework assignment, which may limit the information available and the assumptions that can be made about the function \( g(x) \). The discussion includes varying interpretations of differentiability and continuity, particularly in relation to the parameter \( \alpha \).

bluecode
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement

Refer to attached file.

The attempt at a solution
(a)
[tex] g'(0) = \lim_{x\rightarrow 0} {\frac{g(x)-g(0)}{x-0}}[/tex]
[tex] g'(0) = \lim_{x\rightarrow 0} {\frac{x^\alpha cos(1/x^2)-0}{x}}[/tex]
[tex] g'(0) = \lim_{x\rightarrow 0} {x^{(\alpha-1)} cos(1/x^2)-0}[/tex]
[tex] g'(0) = 0[/tex]
So I've attempted to show that [itex]g'(0) = 0[/itex] and therefore that [itex]g'(x)[/itex] is differentiable at [itex]x = 0[/itex]. In this case, would the values of [itex]\alpha[/itex] for which this condition holds simply be [itex]\alpha> 0[/itex]? It seems to simple for this to be the case.

(b)
My interpretation of "continuously differentiable" is that at [itex]x = 0[/itex], [itex]g(x)[/itex] must be continuous and [itex]g'(x)[/itex] must exist. The latter condition is implied from part (a). So I just need to prove that [itex]g'(x)[/itex] is continuous at [itex]x = 0[/itex].
[tex] -1 ≤ cos(1/x^2) ≤ 1[/tex]
[tex] -x^\alpha ≤ x^{\alpha}cos(1/x^2) ≤ x^\alpha[/tex]
[tex] \lim_{x\rightarrow 0} {-x^\alpha} = 0 [/tex]
and
[tex] \lim_{x\rightarrow 0} {x^\alpha} = 0 [/tex]
so by the Squeeze Law,
[tex] \lim_{x\rightarrow 0} {x^\alpha cos(1/x^2)} = 0 = g(0)[/tex]
For this part, it's a similar scenario.

I've proven that [itex]g'(x)[/itex] is continuously differentiable at [itex]x = 0[/itex], but for this to happen, [itex]\alpha[/itex] can take any value greater than 0, can't it?

I'd be grateful for any assistance with this question. Thanks in advance!
 

Attachments

  • Question 2.png
    Question 2.png
    15.3 KB · Views: 503
Physics news on Phys.org
What if [itex]0<\alpha\leqslant 1[/itex]? Then the limit wouldn't exist, why? Take a look when would happen if [itex]\alpha =1[/itex] for example.
 
bluecode said:
Homework Statement

Refer to attached file.

The attempt at a solution
(a)
[tex] g'(0) = \lim_{x\rightarrow 0} {\frac{g(x)-g(0)}{x-0}}[/tex]
[tex] g'(0) = \lim_{x\rightarrow 0} {\frac{x^\alpha cos(1/x^2)-0}{x}}[/tex]
[tex] g'(0) = \lim_{x\rightarrow 0} {x^{(\alpha-1)} cos(1/x^2)-0}[/tex]
[tex] g'(0) = 0[/tex]
So I've attempted to show that [itex]g'(0) = 0[/itex] and therefore that [itex]g'(x)[/itex] is differentiable at [itex]x = 0[/itex]. In this case, would the values of [itex]\alpha[/itex] for which this condition holds simply be [itex]\alpha> 0[/itex]? It seems to simple for this to be the case.

(b)
My interpretation of "continuously differentiable" is that at [itex]x = 0[/itex], [itex]g(x)[/itex] must be continuous and [itex]g'(x)[/itex] must exist.
That is an incorrect interpretation. As you say below, any differentiable function must be continuous so, with that interpretation, "continuously differentiable" would be no different from "differentiable". "Continuously differentiable" at x= a means that f'(x) exists in some neighborhood of a and f'(x) is continuous at x= a.

The latter condition is implied from part (a). So I just need to prove that [itex]g'(x)[/itex] is continuous at [itex]x = 0[/itex].
[tex] -1 ≤ cos(1/x^2) ≤ 1[/tex]
[tex] -x^\alpha ≤ x^{\alpha}cos(1/x^2) ≤ x^\alpha[/tex]
[tex] \lim_{x\rightarrow 0} {-x^\alpha} = 0 [/tex]
and
[tex] \lim_{x\rightarrow 0} {x^\alpha} = 0 [/tex]
so by the Squeeze Law,
[tex] \lim_{x\rightarrow 0} {x^\alpha cos(1/x^2)} = 0 = g(0)[/tex]
For this part, it's a similar scenario.

I've proven that [itex]g'(x)[/itex] is continuously differentiable at [itex]x = 0[/itex], but for this to happen, [itex]\alpha[/itex] can take any value greater than 0, can't it?

I'd be grateful for any assistance with this question. Thanks in advance!
 
Thanks for the help everyone! I think I understand the question better now.

So taking another go (can someone check whether this would be correct this time?):
(a) For [itex] \lim_{x\rightarrow 0} {x^{(\alpha-1)} cos(1/x^2)}=g'(0) = 0[/itex] to always hold, the following must be satisfied:
[tex] -x^{(\alpha-1)} ≤ x^{(\alpha-1)}cos(1/x^2) ≤ x^{(\alpha-1)}[/tex]
For this to happen, [itex]\alpha > 1[/itex] otherwise [itex]\lim_{x\rightarrow 0} {x^{(\alpha-1)} cos(1/x^2)}[/itex] will be in between negative and positive infinity and so the limit would not exist.

(b) I understand that for g(x) to be continuously differentiable at x=0, g(x) must be differentiable at x=0 and g'(x) must be continuous at x=0.
After differentiating g(x) I eventually get:
[tex] \lim_{x\rightarrow 0} {g'(x)}={\lim_{x\rightarrow 0} [{(\alpha)x^{(\alpha-1)} cos(1/x^2)} + 2x^{(\alpha-3)} sin(1/x^2)}]=0[/tex]
So by the same reasoning as part (a), [itex]\alpha > 3[/itex]

One question though: would it be OK to just say that the power of x in the inequality [itex] -x^{(\alpha-1)} ≤ x^{(\alpha-1)}cos(1/x^2) ≤ x^{(\alpha-1)}[/itex] needs to be greater than 0, and so [itex]\alpha > 1[/itex]?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K