Differential drag on a cup anemometer

  • Thread starter Thread starter cocoon95
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Differential Drag
Click For Summary
Differential drag on a four-cup anemometer is influenced by the shape and drag coefficients of the cups. The drag coefficient for an open cup is approximately 1.42, while a closed cup has a coefficient of about 0.38. When altering the cup's shape, such as slicing it in half, the differential drag may change, but the extent of this change depends on the new shape's surface area and orientation relative to the wind. The discussion highlights the importance of calculating the drag force using the area and the difference in drag coefficients. Understanding these factors is crucial for accurately determining the performance of the anemometer.
cocoon95
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
If differential drag on a four cup anemometer causes its rotation, how does one calculate the differential drag on a specific size cup and with a specific wind velocity assuming the wind is constant and in the same horizontal plane as the four cups.?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
thanks for the link. It got me started in the right direction.
 
okay, The drag coefficeint is clear. If however I slice half of the cup off with a vertical cut and blank the end, so I really have a 1/4 sphere with a flat plate at the end of the cup, does the differential Cd remain the same for a relative wind perpendicular to the 1/4 cup vs the 1/4 sphere. Or does if change and only depend on the surface area of the 1/4 cup and 1/4 sphere?
Remember that shape matters!
 
An open cup is around CD of 1.42, closed side is only 0.38.
http://www.windpower.org/en/tour/wtrb/drag.htm , the area is the same - so the force is just the area * the difference in Cd
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Knowing that the CD for an open cup is 1.42 and the closed side 0.38, is the CD for a 1/2 cup the same as a whole cup or does the CD change due to the different shape. If it changes would it be expected to change by a very small amount say < 0.05 or something larger like 0.10.
 
For simple comparison, I think the same thought process can be followed as a block slides down a hill, - for block down hill, simple starting PE of mgh to final max KE 0.5mv^2 - comparing PE1 to max KE2 would result in finding the work friction did through the process. efficiency is just 100*KE2/PE1. If a mousetrap car travels along a flat surface, a starting PE of 0.5 k th^2 can be measured and maximum velocity of the car can also be measured. If energy efficiency is defined by...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
8K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
14K