Differential Eqtns - with a matrix

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around solving a differential equation involving a matrix, specifically focusing on eigenvalues and eigenvectors. The original poster attempts to analyze the behavior of solutions as time approaches infinity and the implications of having multiple eigenvectors in a system.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the process of finding eigenvalues and eigenvectors, with the original poster questioning the behavior of solutions as time progresses. They also explore the implications of having multiple vectors in the context of the problem.

Discussion Status

Some participants provide insights into the formal structure of the problem, suggesting a method to approach the differential equation. The original poster raises questions about the behavior of solutions and the significance of eigenvectors, indicating an ongoing exploration of these concepts.

Contextual Notes

The original poster notes constraints regarding the interpretation of eigenvectors and their behavior at infinity, as well as the implications of having a larger matrix with more eigenvectors.

flyingpig
Messages
2,574
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement

http://img847.imageshack.us/img847/2259/unledgqc.th.png

Uploaded with ImageShack.us

The Attempt at a Solution



I am guessing both part a) and part b) implies that I must solve the differential equation first to answer those questions and I have

det(A-λI) = 0

\begin{bmatrix}<br /> -\lambda &amp; 1\\ <br /> \frac{1}{4}&amp; \frac{3}{4} - \lambda<br /> \end{bmatrix} = 0

Solving I got my λ = -1/4 or 1

So starting with λ = 1, I build my vector

[A - λI | 0]

After row reducing and I found my parametric eqtn to be

\vec{x} = x_2 \begin{bmatrix}<br /> 1\\ <br /> 1<br /> \end{bmatrix}

For λ = -1/4, I got

\vec{x} = x_2 \begin{bmatrix}<br /> -4\\ <br /> 1<br /> \end{bmatrix}

So my final vector should be (where I decided to let x2 = 1 for convenience. Also does anyone know why I can't let x2 be 0? I have a sneaking suspicion that it has to do with eigenvectors can't be 0...)

\vec{x(t)} = c_1\begin{bmatrix}1\\ 1\end{bmatrix}e^t + c_2\begin{bmatrix}4\\ 1\end{bmatrix}e^{\frac{-1t}{4}}

So now to answer the question

For part a) I am assuming they want to ask what happens t → ∞

In that case, one of them "diverges" and one of them "converges" to 0.

So (from my notes), this is a saddle point.

For part b)

\vec{x(0)} = c_1\begin{bmatrix}1\\ 1\end{bmatrix} + c_2\begin{bmatrix}4\\ 1\end{bmatrix} = \begin{bmatrix} -2\\ 1\end{bmatrix}

This is too trivial, I just have to solve for my constants and then plug it back into the neat equation.

Now my question is, for part a, am I right? What exactly happens if one of the vectors goes to negative infinity and one goes to positive infinity?

Also, there is only two vectors in this problem (2 x 2 matrix), what if this is bigger? Like if I ended up with three vectors, what happens if two goes to infinity and one goes to 0?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Am I right about the behavior?
 
You've done very well but it might help to have a formal way of thinking about problems like this.
You have X'= AX where A is a "diagonalizable" matrix. That means that there exist an invertible matrix,
P, such that P^{-1}AP= D where D is a diagonal matrix having the eigenvalues of A on
its main diagonal. Since P^{-1} is a constant matrix, P^{-1}X&#039;= (P^{-1}X)&#039; so,.
multiply on both sides by P^{-1},
(P^{-1}X)&#039;= P^{-1}AX= P^{-1}A(PP^{-1})X= (P^{-1}AP)(P^{-1}X)= D(P^{-1}X)

Now let Y= P^{-1}X so the equation becomes Y&#039;= DY.

Here, that is
Y&#039;= \begin{batrix}y_1&#039; \\ y_2&#039;}= \begin{bmatrix}-1/4 &amp; 0 \\ 0 &amp; 1\end{bmatrix}\begin{bmatrix}y_1 \\ y_2\end{bmatrix}

That gives the two uncoupled equations, y_1&#039;= -(1/4)y_1 and y_2&#039;= y_2.

The solutions to those are y_1(t)= c_1e^{-(1/4)t} and y_2(t)= c_2e^t just
as you have.

That gives
Y(t)= \begin{bmatrix}c_1e^{-(1/4)t} \\ c_2e^t\end{bmatrix}

Finally, since we defined Y= P^{-1}X, X= PY.

Yes, as you say, an eigenvector corresponding to eigenvalue -1/4 is <-4, 1> and an eigenvector
corresponding to eigenvalue 1 is <1, 1> so we have
P= \begin{bmatrix}-4 &amp; 1 \\ 1 &amp; 1\end{bmatrix}
and
X= \begin{bmatrix}-4 &amp; 1 \\ 1 &amp; 1\end{bmatrix}\begin{bmatrix}c_1e^{-(1/4)t} \\ c_2e^t\end{bmatrix}
X= \begin{bmatrix}-4c_1e^{-(1/4)t}+ c_2e^t \\ c_1e^{-(1/4)t}+ c_2e^t\end{bmatrix}

Now, as t goes to infinity, the negative exponential will go to 0 while the positive exponential gets
larger and larger. But for very large t, the solution will act like
X= \begin{bmatrix}c_2e^{t} \\ c_2e^t\end{bmatrix}
so that x_1(t)\approx x_2(t).
 
What if there are three vectors? Like x_1 (t), x_2 (t), x_3 (t)?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K