Differential equation of vector field

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around deriving a differential equation for the flow lines of a vector field represented by the components dF/dx and dF/dy. It emphasizes that while dF/dy is a vector, the focus should be on how to express the field lines using the relationship dF/dt = F, leading to the equations dx/dt = F1 and dy/dt = F2. Participants debate the application of the chain rule and whether to convert vector components into scalars for differential representation. The importance of clarity in reasoning and the utility of various mathematical tools to achieve the goal of defining field lines is highlighted. Ultimately, the conversation seeks to clarify the correct approach to expressing the relationship between the variables in the context of vector fields.
so_gr_lo
Messages
69
Reaction score
10
Homework Statement
Write the vector field F = [-4, -xcos(5x)] as a differential equation (dy/dx)
Relevant Equations
Dy/dx = dF/dx x dy/dF
I was thinking of using the chain rule with

dF/dx = 0i + (3xsin(3x) - cos(3x))j

and

dF/dy = 0i + 0j

but dF/dy is still a vector so how can it be inverted to get dy/dF ?

what are the other methods to calculate this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A vector field is not a differential equation.

What you can do is write a differential equation that describes the flow lines of the vector field. Is this your purpose?
 
  • Like
Likes topsquark
Yeah I need a differential equation for the field lines
 
So, by definition the field lines of ##\vec F## satisfy ##d\vec x/dt = \vec F## or, in components,
$$
\frac{dx}{dt} = F_1, \quad \frac{dy}{dt} = F_2,
$$
where ##F_i## are the components of ##\vec F##. What does this tell you about the field lines in terms of ##dy/dx##?
 
  • Like
Likes topsquark
dy/dx = dy/dt x dt/dx = F2/F1 ?
 
Or that F = dx/dt + dy/dt
 
One advice that I generally give my students when they write two different answers is to think twice about what they write down. It often helps clearing your thoughts and thinking about the reasoning behind what each statement would be. So what would be your reasoning behind these statements?
 
  • Like
Likes fresh_42 and topsquark
I gave 2 different statements because I’m not sure if I am supposed to use the chain rule or not. The problem is that I don’t know how to turn the vector into a scalar so that I can write it as a differential.
 
so_gr_lo said:
I gave 2 different statements because I’m not sure if I am supposed to use the chain rule or not. The problem is that I don’t know how to turn the vector into a scalar so that I can write it as a differential.
You should think less of what you are ”supposed” to do and more in terms of what tools you can use to achieve your goal. What does the chain rule tell you? Is that useful in this case?
 
  • Like
Likes topsquark
  • #10
The chain rule allows you to deal with composite functions, but since I don’t actually have the y and x components written in t explicitly maybe it’s not necessary. I think the flow lines need to equal F at each point since they are the tangent vector. In that case dy/dx = y’(t)/x’(t) then dy/dx = 1/2 xcos(5x). Perhaps this is the correct appproach? In this case I just set x = -4i and y = -xcos(5x)j and ignore the unit vectors.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K