Differential equation question, 4th derivative of y + y = 0

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the differential equation y^4 + y = 0, specifically focusing on its characteristic equation m^4 + 1 = 0 and the nature of its roots. Participants explore the implications of complex roots in the context of solving the equation.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the roots of the characteristic equation and question the validity of certain roots, particularly regarding the presence of complex numbers. There is an exploration of how to derive the roots using polar form and de Moivre's theorem.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants presenting differing views on the roots of the equation. Some provide insights into the polar representation of roots, while others seek clarification on the derivation process. There is no explicit consensus, but multiple interpretations and approaches are being explored.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference the context of their textbook chapter on characteristic equations and complex roots, indicating a framework for their discussion. There is also mention of hints from a professor regarding the nature of the roots, suggesting a deeper exploration of the topic.

Pr0x1mo
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
Ok, the question/equation is

y^4 + y = 0

Now i know that the characteristic equation is m^4 + 1 = 0

and if i would to solve that it would give me plus or minus 1i as a complex root. so the general solution would be:

c1cos(x) + c2sin(x) but i know this is not the answer because since its a 4th degree, it should have 4 roots, repeated or not.

When i rant it thru wolframalpha, it gave me this: http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=d^4y%2Fdx^4+%2B+y+%3D+0

How did it get to that answer?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The equation m4+1=0, does not have i as a root...
 
Yes it does, which is the reason why wolfram alpha spat out the general solution using cos + sin (bernouilli).
 
Maybe you should use i4+1 as input in wolfram alpha...
 
lol ^ No, but thanks for your help.
 
Pr0x1mo said:
Yes it does, which is the reason why wolfram alpha spat out the general solution using cos + sin (bernouilli).
No it doesn't. i is not a root of m^4 + 1 = 0. i^4 = (-1)^2 = +1. Replacing m by i in the equation m^4 + 1 = 0 gives you 1 + 1 != 0.

The four roots are complex numbers whose arguments (angles) are pi/4, 3pi/4, 5pi/4, 7pi/4.
 
The reason i know that there are i's in the solution is because this question came from the chapter in my book titled "Characteristic equations and complex roots," did you take a look at the solution that wolframalpha displayed? I know that this is the answer because my Professor alluded to hints that there would be more than one e^x(c1cosx + c2sinx) because of repeated roots.

I just want to figure out how the equation was rewritten to get plus or minus 1/(2)^1/2 i as a root.
 
but i is NOT a root of m4+1=0...
The roots of m4+1=0 are \pm\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\pm \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}i.

Try to put the following in wolfram alpha: x4+1=0. You'll see immediately what the roots are...
 
micromass said:
but i is NOT a root of m4+1=0...
The roots of m4+1=0 are \pm\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\pm \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}i.

Try to put the following in wolfram alpha: x4+1=0. You'll see immediately what the roots are...

Ok, see, that was my entire question how did they get plus or minus \pm\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\pm \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}i ??
 
  • #10
micromass and I are pretty much saying the same thing, but in different forms. He has shown the roots in Cartesian form (a + bi), and I said what they were in a sort of polar form.

One of the roots is cos(pi/4) + i*sin(pi/4), or 1/sqrt(2) + 1/sqrt(2) * i.
The other roots are
cos(3pi/4) + i*sin(3pi/4) = -1/sqrt(2) + 1/sqrt(2) * i
cos(5pi/4) + i*sin(5pi/4) = -1/sqrt(2) - 1/sqrt(2) * i
cos(7pi/4) + i*sin(7pi/4) = 1/sqrt(2) - 1/sqrt(2) * i
 
  • #11
Ok, but how did you solve the equation to get those roots?
 
  • #12
First, by changing -1 to its polar form of cos(pi) + i sin(pi), which is really cos(pi + 2k *pi) + i sin(pi + 2k*pi), and
second, by using the Theorem of de Moivre, which says that [r(cos(x) + i sin(x)]4 = rn(cos(n *x) + i sin(n * x))

Since z4 = -1, then z = (-1)1/4,
so z = [cos(pi + 2k *pi) + i sin(pi + 2k*pi)]1/4
= cos(pi/4 + 2k/4 *pi) + i sin(pi/4 + 2k/4*pi)
= cos(pi/4 + k * pi/2) + i sin(pi/4 + k * pi/2)

The formula above holds for all integer values of k, but there are only four distinct roots of the equation z4 = -1, corresponding to k = 0, 1, 2, and 3. When k >= 4, the roots start repeating.
 
  • #13
Awesome thanks
 

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K