Differential Forms & the Star Operator

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the geometrical interpretation of the Hodge star operator in the context of differential forms, particularly in four-dimensional Minkowski spacetime. The Hodge star establishes a duality between p-forms and (d-p)-forms, exemplified by the relationship between a one-form J and its dual three-form *J. Key equations from Maxwell's theory, such as dF = 0 and d *F = 4π *J, illustrate the operator's utility in electromagnetism. Recommended literature includes "Gravitation" by Misner, Thorne, and Wheeler, and "Applied Differential Geometry" by Burke for further exploration of these concepts.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of differential forms and their properties
  • Familiarity with the Hodge star operator and its applications
  • Basic knowledge of Maxwell's equations in electromagnetism
  • Concepts of Minkowski spacetime and volume forms
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of the Hodge star operator in curved spacetimes
  • Explore the relationship between differential forms and electromagnetic theory
  • Learn about the integration of forms over manifolds
  • Investigate the differences between simple forms and rank two tensors
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and students of theoretical physics who are interested in differential geometry, electromagnetism, and the mathematical foundations of general relativity.

leon1127
Messages
484
Reaction score
0
I am reading some books about differential forms. I don't quite understand what is the geometrical meaning of star (hodge) operator. Can anyone give me a hand please?

Leon
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In d dimensions, the Hodge star sets up a duality between p-forms at (d-p)-forms, via
\alpha \wedge \beta = ({}^\star\alpha , \beta) \, \omega
where \omega is the volume form (a basis form in the one dimensional space of d-forms), and where \alpha is a p-form, and where \beta, \; {}^\star\alpha are (d-p)-forms.

So for example, when d=4, we can describe a current using a one-form J or a dual three-form *J, and given a two-form describing the EM field, F, we can take its dual to find another two-form, *F. Half of Maxwell's equations are then seen to be trivial: dF = 0 automatically since F=dA. The other half are then d {}^\star F = 4 \pi \, {}^\star J.

The book Gravitation by Misner, Thorne, and Wheeler contains some nice discussion. For example, from the simple two-form F = -q/r^2 \, dt \wedge dr (which describes a Coloumb-type purely radial electrostatic field), we obtain the simple two-form {}^\star F= q \sin(\theta) d\theta \wedge d\phi, which is suitable for integration over a sphere. The duality becomes even more vivid if you use the coframe
\sigma^{\hat{0}} = -dt, \; \sigma^{\hat{1}} = dr, \; \sigma^{\hat{2}} = r \, d\theta, \; \sigma^{\hat{3}} = r \sin(\theta) \, d\phi[/tex]<br /> Then we obtain<br /> F = q/r^2 \, \sigma^{\hat{0}} \wedge \sigma^{\hat{1}} , \; {}^\star F = q/r^2 \, \sigma^{\hat{2}} \wedge \sigma^{\hat{3}}<br /> which we could have obtained even faster using <br /> {}^\star \left( \sigma^{\hat{0}} \wedge \sigma^{\hat{1}} \right) =\sigma^{\hat{2}} \wedge \sigma^{\hat{3}}<br /> However, the &quot;coordinate coframe&quot; is usually more convenient when we are actually integrating. Note that I am talking about Minkowski spacetime here, not a curved spacetime. The volume form is simply the wedge product of the four covectors making up the coframe. However, this can be readily generalized to work on curved spacetimes.<br /> <br /> (This example is potentially misleading, since in general, F will be a &quot;rank two&quot; two-form, meaning that it contains both dt \wedge dr and d\theta \wedge d\phi terms. A rank one exterior form is often called a &quot;simple&quot; form. Don&#039;t confuse this &quot;rank&quot; with &quot;second rank tensor&quot;! In our example, our &quot;rank one&quot; or &quot;simple&quot; two-form F corresponds to an antisymmetric &quot;second rank&quot; tensor.)<br /> <br /> Another good book is Burke, Applied Differential Geometry.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 70 ·
3
Replies
70
Views
16K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K