Differential Squared: Do We Always Assume (dx)^2=0?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter learner928
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Differential
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the treatment of higher-order terms, specifically (dx)^2, in Taylor expansions. Participants explore whether such terms can be ignored under certain conditions, particularly when the first-order term is absent, and the implications of this in the context of limits and approximations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question whether (dx)^2 can be ignored if there is no first-order term present, suggesting that the decision may depend on the context of the approximation.
  • Others clarify that higher-order terms are typically ignored due to their rapid decrease in magnitude relative to lower-order terms, particularly as n approaches infinity in the Taylor expansion.
  • A participant proposes a scenario where y=1+(dx)^2 and asks if (dx)^2 can still be ignored in the limit as x approaches 0, indicating a need for clarity on the conditions under which terms are considered negligible.
  • Another participant emphasizes that while (dx)^2 is indeed much smaller than dx, it cannot be ignored if it is the only term present in the expression.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the conditions under which (dx)^2 can be ignored, with no consensus reached on whether it can be disregarded when the first-order term is absent.

Contextual Notes

Limitations in the discussion include the reliance on intuitive arguments rather than rigorous mathematical justification for when to ignore higher-order terms.

learner928
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
Quick question on high order term such as (dx)^2

in taylor expansion, higher order terms such as (dx)^2 is ignored because it's too small compared to the first order term...

if there is no first order term, can second order term still be ignored?

eg. if y=(dx)^2, do we always assume y=0 because (dx)^2 is too small?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In a Taylor Expansion, we expand [itex]f[/itex] about a point [itex]x_0[/itex]. Then we take successive derivatives at [itex]x_0[/itex]. So when you say "y=(dx)^2" do you mean that the first term in the Taylor expansion is [itex]f''(x_0)[/itex]?

Also, the higher order terms are not ignored because the derivatives are getting smaller. The higher order terms are ignored because the terms all have a [itex]1/n![/itex] which is getting very small, very fast as [itex]n \to \infty[/itex].

Now, to know when to cut the terms off, you need to 1)know how precise you need to be and 2)use a remainder term to get a bound on the truncation error (here is a wikipedia article: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taylor's_theorem)
 
sorry, maybe I should ask my question this way:

if we have y=1+dx+(dx)^2 in the limit of x->0, we ignore the term (dx)^2 and approximate y=1+dx, is this because the term (dx)^2 is too small relative to dx or is it because the term is just absolutely too small?

ie. if we have y=1+(dx)^2 in the limit of x->0, do we still ignore (dx)^2 in this case or we can't since there is no dx term.
 
You mean as [itex]dx \to 0[/itex] right? Usually the arguments you are making are more intuitive type arguments rather than rigorous arguments. But, we ignore the dx^2 because it is much smaller than dx. In your question, the dx^2 can't be ignored.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K