Differentiate x to a complex power?

dyn
Messages
774
Reaction score
63
Is it possible to differentiate xa+bi where a and b are real ? if so what is the answer ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The rule ##\frac{d}{dx}x^{k}=kx^{k-1}## works even if ##k## is a complex number. Write "D[x^(a+b*I),x]" in Wolfram Alpha and see what comes as a result.
 
dyn said:
Is it possible to differentiate xa+bi where a and b are real ? if so what is the answer ?
Yes, it's possible.

Is this homework?
 
No , its not homework. So the answer is (a+bi)xa-1+bi ?
 
You don't say whether you intend "x" itself to be real or complex. It is more common to use "z" for a complex variable with z= x+ iy, x and y both real.
In any case, it is true that the derivative of z^p with respect to z, z a complex variable, p a complex number, is pz^{p-1} although the proof is harder.
 
I think you need to choose a branch of Logz in some cases: if you have ## i^i## , then you write this as ## e^ilog(i)## , and the value log(i) will depend on the branch of log that you chose.
 
Thanks for your replies. I asked the question because I saw it in a book but it seems strange that the number 1 is only subtracted from the real part of the power. Also I have never encountered such a function before.
 
dyn said:
it seems strange that the number 1 is only subtracted from the real part of the power.
Represent a+ib as the constant z and write the function as ez*ln(x). Apply the chain rule and you will get a factor of d/dx(ln(x)), which is 1/x. This is a factor of x-1. That is where subtracting 1 from the real part comes from.
 
  • #10
FactChecker said:
Represent a+ib as the constant z and write the function as ez*ln(x). Apply the chain rule and you will get a factor of d/dx(ln(x)), which is 1/x. This is a factor of x-1. That is where subtracting 1 from the real part comes from.
But how do you know x is Real valued and positive to use lnx?
 
  • #11
WWGD said:
But how do you know x is Real valued and positive to use lnx?
That's a good point. I don't know how much complex analysis is reasonable in answering the OP. But I guess if a complex exponent in the original function xa+bi is ok, then the natural log of a complex variable will be ok. In any case, I hope it makes the answer as to why only the real part of the exponent changes by -1 more intuitive.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K