Differentiation under the integral sign

  • Thread starter naaa00
  • Start date
  • #1
91
0

Homework Statement



R(x) := ∫ exp ( -y^2 - x^2/y^2 ) dy

The Attempt at a Solution



I move the derivative operator inside the integral and differentiate with respect to x

R'(x) = ∫ [ - 2x/y^2 ] exp ( -x^2/y^2 - y^2 ) dy

Then I let: t = x/y and dy = - x/t^2 dt

R'(x) = 2 ∫ [ - x ] [ t^2 / x^2 ] exp ( t^2 - x^2/t^2 ) [ - x/t^2 ] dt

=> R'(x) = 2 R(x)

But that last part is supposed to be R'(x) = - 2 R(x) - I don't see why.

Then, it follows that this integrates to R(x) = Ae^(−2x) and x = 0 gives R(0) = √π. This last part I don't get it neither. From where the e^(-2x) came from?

Any help is very appreciated.
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
Ray Vickson
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Dearly Missed
10,706
1,722

Homework Statement



R(x) := ∫ exp ( -y^2 - x^2/y^2 ) dy

The Attempt at a Solution



I move the derivative operator inside the integral and differentiate with respect to x

R'(x) = ∫ [ - 2x/y^2 ] exp ( -x^2/y^2 - y^2 ) dy

Then I let: t = x/y and dy = - x/t^2 dt

R'(x) = 2 ∫ [ - x ] [ t^2 / x^2 ] exp ( t^2 - x^2/t^2 ) [ - x/t^2 ] dt

=> R'(x) = 2 R(x)

But that last part is supposed to be R'(x) = - 2 R(x) - I don't see why.

Then, it follows that this integrates to R(x) = Ae^(−2x) and x = 0 gives R(0) = √π. This last part I don't get it neither. From where the e^(-2x) came from?

Any help is very appreciated.

I also get R'(x) = 2*[R(x) + c], where c is a constant of integration. Here are the steps, done in Maple 11 (with output written in LaTeX):

R:=Int(exp(-x^2/y^2-y^2),y);
[tex] R = \int e^{\left(\displaystyle -\frac{x^2}{y^2} - y^2\right)} \, dy [/tex]
Rp:=diff(R,x);
[tex] Rp = \int -\frac{2x}{y^2} e^{\left(\displaystyle -\frac{x^2}{y^2} - y^2\right)} \, dy [/tex]
changevar(x/y=t,Rp);
[tex] \int e^{\left(\displaystyle -\frac{x^2}{t^2} - t^2\right)} \, dt [/tex]

RGV
 
  • #3
91
0
I just realize that I didn't consider the limits of integration... The limits are from 0 to infinity...

but still something must be wrong...
 
  • #4
834
2
Yeah, the negative probably comes in from having to flip the limits of integration when you transform to the varaible t.
 
  • #5
HallsofIvy
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
41,847
966
Does "exp(-y^2- x^2/y^2)" mean [itex]e^{-y^2- (x^2/y^2)}[/itex] or [itex]e^{(-y^2- x^2)/y^2}[/itex].
 
  • #6
91
0
Hello Halls,

The one in the middle.
 
  • #7
SammyS
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
11,398
1,045
I just realize that I didn't consider the limits of integration... The limits are from 0 to infinity...

but still something must be wrong...

Does "exp(-y^2- x^2/y^2)" mean [itex]e^{-y^2- (x^2/y^2)}[/itex] or [itex]e^{(-y^2- x^2)/y^2}[/itex].

So the definition of R(x) is:
[itex]\displaystyle R(x) := \int_{0}^{\infty} e^{\left( -\frac{x^2}{y^2} - y^2\right)} \, dy[/itex]​
That explains why R is not a function of y.
 

Related Threads on Differentiation under the integral sign

Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
902
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
645
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
880
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • Last Post
Replies
7
Views
2K
Top