Difficult Improper Integral Involving Arctan(x)

Click For Summary
The integral in question is int((arctan(Pi*x)-arctan(x))/x, x = 0 .. infinity), which can be expressed as an iterated integral. The solution involves careful handling of logarithmic divergence at the upper limit, leading to a limit expression that simplifies to (π/2)ln(π). Substituting variables helps clarify the integral's behavior, confirming the final result. The discussion also highlights a generalization for integrals of the form int( (f(αx) - f(βx))/x, dx), linking the limits of f at zero and infinity to the logarithmic difference of α and β.
caleb5040
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
So recently I've been working through some challenge problems from my old calculus textbook for fun. I'm stuck on one of the integrals, though, and can't find any solutions online. This isn't for homework...it's for my interest and hopefully the interest of others. Here it is (sorry about the formatting):

int((arctan(Pi*x)-arctan(x))/x, x = 0 .. infinity)

In the problem statement it says you first need to express the integral as an iterated integral. I also know the answer is (π/2)ln(π).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
caleb5040 said:
So recently I've been working through some challenge problems from my old calculus textbook for fun. I'm stuck on one of the integrals, though, and can't find any solutions online. This isn't for homework...it's for my interest and hopefully the interest of others. Here it is (sorry about the formatting):

int((arctan(Pi*x)-arctan(x))/x, x = 0 .. infinity)

In the problem statement it says you first need to express the integral as an iterated integral. I also know the answer is (π/2)ln(π).
Interesting problem ...

\displaystyle \int_0^\infty \frac{\arctan(\pi x)-\arctan(x)}{x}\,dx

That this may come from an iterated integral suggests:
\displaystyle <br /> \int_0^\infty \left(\displaystyle \left.\arctan(y)\right|_{y=x}^{y=\pi x}\right)\frac{1}{x}\,dx​

arctan(y) is the anti-derivative of what function?

If you write this as an iterated integral, what happens if you change the order of integration ?
 
The answer is zero.

Edit:
Actually, because each term:
<br /> \int_{0}^{\infty}{\frac{\arctan x}{x} \, dx}<br />
is logarithmically divergent on the upper bound, we need to be more careful. Your integral reduces to the following limit:
<br /> \lim_{B \rightarrow \infty} \int_{B}^{B \pi}{\frac{\arctan x}{x} \, dx}<br />
[strikeout]Make the substitution x = \tan(z/2). You will get:
<br /> 2 \,\int^{2\arctan(B/\pi)}_{2\arctan{B}}{\frac{z}{\sin z} \, dz}, \ B \rightarrow \infty<br />
[/strikeout]

Edit2:
Scratch the last subst. Try this x = B y. You get:
<br /> \int_{1}^{\pi}{\frac{\arctan(B \, y)}{y} \, dy}, \ B \rightarrow \infty<br />
Now, in the above limit the arctangent is \pi/2, and the remaining integral is \ln \pi. Combining everything, we get:
<br /> \frac{\pi \, \ln \pi}{2}<br />
 
Last edited:
Awesome! Thank you both. Those were just the thoughts I needed to do it myself.
Sorry for not posting my initial attempts...they both involved rewriting the integral as an iterated integral and switching the order (I figured out two ways of doing this). The trouble was that each time the integral became more complex. Now it makes sense, though.
 
You might be interested to know that in general, if \frac{f(x)}{x} is integrable on any interval [a , b] for 0&lt;a&lt;b then for all \alpha, \beta &gt; 0:

\int_{0}^{∞} \frac{f(\alpha x)-f(\beta x)} {x} dx = (A-B)\ln(\frac{\beta} {\alpha})

where \displaystyle A = \lim_{x \rightarrow 0^{+}} f(x) and \displaystyle B = \lim_{x \rightarrow ∞} f(x)
 
Boorglar said:
You might be interested to know that in general, if \frac{f(x)}{x} is integrable on any interval [a , b] for 0&lt;a&lt;b then for all \alpha, \beta &gt; 0:

\int_{0}^{∞} \frac{f(\alpha x)-f(\beta x)} {x} dx = (A-B)\ln(\frac{\beta} {\alpha})

where \displaystyle A = \lim_{x \rightarrow 0^{+}} f(x) and \displaystyle B = \lim_{x \rightarrow ∞} f(x)

Interesting! I think I see how to prove the generalization.
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K