Difficult problem in Rotational Mechanics JEE 2017 Comprehension paper

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on a challenging problem from the JEE Advanced 2017 exam regarding rotational mechanics, specifically the kinetic energy of a ring. The participant discusses the application of the no-slip condition, represented by the equation ωR - vc = ω0r, and the derivation of forces acting on the ring, including normal force (N) and frictional force (f). The participant expresses confusion over the instantaneous axis of rotation (IAOR) and seeks clarification on why it is assumed to be at the center of the small ring, despite having derived relevant equations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of rotational mechanics principles, including the no-slip condition.
  • Familiarity with kinetic energy concepts in rotational motion.
  • Knowledge of free body diagrams (FBD) and force analysis.
  • Proficiency in solving equations involving normal and frictional forces.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the concept of instantaneous axis of rotation (IAOR) in rotational dynamics.
  • Study the derivation and application of the no-slip condition in various mechanical systems.
  • Explore detailed examples of kinetic energy calculations for rigid bodies in motion.
  • Learn about the relationship between angular velocity and linear velocity in rotational systems.
USEFUL FOR

Students preparing for competitive exams like JEE, physics enthusiasts, and educators looking to deepen their understanding of rotational mechanics and problem-solving strategies in complex scenarios.

physicsissohard
Messages
19
Reaction score
1
Homework Statement
One twirls a circular ring (of mass M and radius R) near the tip of one's finger as shown in Figure 1 In the process the finger never loses contact with the inner rim of the ring. The finger traces out the surface of a cone, shown by the dotted line. The radius of the path traced out by the point where the ring and the finger is in contact is r. The finger rotates with an angular velocity omega_o. The rotating ring rolls without slipping on the outside of a smaller circle described by the point where the ring and the finger is in contact (Figure-2). The coefficient of friction between the ring and the finger is u and the acceleration due to gravity is g
Relevant Equations
its down
This question is from the Jee Advanced 2017. This question stumped me because it was very difficult to do, the first part of the comprehension was asking for the kinetic energy of the ring.

This is what I mean.
Using the no-slip condition we can write ##\omega R-v_c=\omega_0r##. This is the no-slip condition. the relative velocity between the finger and the point of contact of the ring is ##0##. I assumed the angular velocity vector to be pointing out of the page and the finger to be moving in the counterclockwise direction, this is obvious through intuition.

Now if you draw fbd of the ring, you can come up with the equation ##N=\frac{mv^2}{x}##. Where ##N## is the normal force and ##x## is the distance between the center of mass and the IAOR(instantaneous axis of Rotation). the other equation is ##f=mg## and ##f=\mu N## where ##f## is the frictional force.

I don't know what to do with these how do they help solve the questions. This is the actual physics way to do it. All the other solutions on youtube and else where just assume by intuition(not obvious though) that the IAOR is at the center of the small circle, which basically sovles the question. Now I want proof of that, why is IAOR of this system the center of small ring. I came up with equations as shown as above but for some reason they aren't helping why?

I used the defining feature of the system to create equations, what did I miss.
Screenshot 2024-01-26 212303.png
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
I presume ##v_c## is the instantaneous velocity of the centre of the ring. I find it more natural to express the ring's motion as the sum of a circular motion of its centre and its motion, rate ##\omega##, about that centre.
What are the radius and rate of the former and the radius of the latter?
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K