Difficult UCM/friction question

  • Thread starter Thread starter floridaMAO
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around the dynamics of a small cube placed inside a rotating funnel and the forces acting on it, including friction, gravity, and normal force. Participants explore how the direction of static friction changes depending on the rotation speed of the funnel, with friction acting upwards when the rotation is slow and downwards when it is fast. The relationship between the maximum and minimum rotation speeds (v) is clarified, noting that maximum v corresponds to a scenario where the normal force approaches zero, while minimum v involves maximum friction acting upwards. The necessity of a free-body diagram is suggested to better visualize the forces at play. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for determining the conditions under which the cube remains stationary relative to the funnel.
floridaMAO
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
A very small cube of mass m is placed on the inside of a funnel rotating about a vertical axis (the central axis of the funnel) at a constant rate of v revolutions per second. The wall of the funnel makes an angle \theta with the horizontal. The coefficient of static friction between cube and funnel is \mu_s and the center of the cube is at a distance r from the axis of rotation. Find the (a) largest and (b) smallest values of v for which the cube will not move with respect to the funnel.

For reference, this is problem 53 chapter 6 of Halliday Resnick Krane vol. 1.

Am I correct in thinking that friction, gravity and normal force are the only forces acting on the box? And that maximum v corresponds to minimum friction force (0?)? And that minimum v corresponds to maximum friction force (\mu_sN)?

If it helps, the answers to the above are (a)\frac{1}{2\pi}\sqrt{\frac{g(\tan(\theta)+\mu_s)}{r(1-\mu_s\tan(\theta))}} and (b) \frac{1}{2\pi}\sqrt{\frac{g(\tan(\theta)-\mu_s)}{r(1+\mu_s\tan(\theta))}} (from the answers in the back of my book :cool:). I'm hoping for an explanation of these answers. It might help to notice that the expressions inside the square roots are (a) \frac{g}{r}\tan(\theta+\tan^{-1}(\mu_s)) and (b) \frac{g}{r}\tan(\theta-\tan^{-1}(\mu_s))
 
Physics news on Phys.org
u r somewhat correct, but not fully. consider the tendency of the box movement when the funnel is rotating slowly. the centrifugal force pressing the cube with the wall will be less and hence the friction will also be less and gravity will pull it down for slow enough force. so the friction will act upward for the lower limit of rot speed.
but for a large rot speed the centrifugal force will be large and the component of it along the the incline of funnel may 'beat' the gravity and pull it upward along the incline and friction will be downward in this case, i.e, for higher limit of rot speed the friction is downward.
so it is not the case of max or min friction. it is actually the case of direction of limiting friction along the incline.
 
floridaMAO said:
Am I correct in thinking that friction, gravity and normal force are the only forces acting on the box? And that maximum v corresponds to minimum friction force (0?)? And that minimum v corresponds to maximum friction force (\mu_sN)?

Static friction acts against relative motion. That cube could slip down the wall when the rotation is slow: then friction points upwards, parallel to the wall; or it would go up at too fast rotation: then the friction points at the opposite direction.

ehild
 
thinking about it again, for the case of maximum v, I am actually imagining the normal force to be 0...
I'm visualizing the funnel spinning too fast and the box flying off the plane entirely, which would correspond to N=0. For the case of minimum v, yes that's what I meant, maximal friction pointing upwards.

My justification: the centripetal force is provided by the normal and friction forces (gravity is perpendicular to the radius of rotation). Frictional force points outwardly and normal force inwardly, at all times, so Fc=Nx-Ffx (centripetal force is the normal force along the radial direction minus the friction along that direction). At a certain point, the centripetal force will have to become so great (meaning v is great, and N will have to be great to provide the force) that the y component of the normal force is greater than Fg, and thus the block accelerates off the plan into free-fall.

Seem logical?
 
No. Why don't you show a free-body diagram?

ehild
 
Thread 'Correct statement about size of wire to produce larger extension'
The answer is (B) but I don't really understand why. Based on formula of Young Modulus: $$x=\frac{FL}{AE}$$ The second wire made of the same material so it means they have same Young Modulus. Larger extension means larger value of ##x## so to get larger value of ##x## we can increase ##F## and ##L## and decrease ##A## I am not sure whether there is change in ##F## for first and second wire so I will just assume ##F## does not change. It leaves (B) and (C) as possible options so why is (C)...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 97 ·
4
Replies
97
Views
6K
  • · Replies 44 ·
2
Replies
44
Views
11K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K