Difficulty understanding Newtonian mechanics with stationary force

AI Thread Summary
Newton's Second Law states that force equals mass times acceleration (F=ma), leading to confusion when considering scenarios where there is no acceleration, such as a person pushing against a wall. In this case, while the person exerts a force on the wall, the wall exerts an equal and opposite force back, resulting in no net acceleration. Similarly, a bicycle moving at a constant velocity experiences no net force according to the law, but momentum is still present due to the continuous force exerted by the cyclist. The key to understanding these scenarios lies in recognizing that external forces, like friction and ground reaction forces, contribute to the overall dynamics. Thus, the apparent contradiction resolves when considering all forces acting on the system.
Analog711
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
I apologize if this seems much too "freshman", and may come across as annoyingly simple to some more trained or educated on this board. However I will ask the question anyways as I have failed to find an answer elsewhere.


Under Newton's Second Law of Motion, f=ma.
thus F = kg (m/s^2)

But when a person pushes against a wall like in the picture below, there is no acceleration, a=0.

Fphoto_61390509_C_3_BK.jpg

The person and the wall have 0 velocity and 0 acceleration.

If a=0 then F=m(0), F=0
How can there be no force here (treating it mathematically according to the formula), when the person is exerting a force upon a body(the wall)?


---

And secondly, if an object of a certain mass and velocity, is in motion but not accelerating,
Newtons second law also would calculate that there is no force according to the formula.

Say a 4 kg bicycle moving at a consistent velocity of 2 m/s, that has 0 acceleration.
http://www.theglobalintelligencer.com/images/bicycle.jpg

F=(4kg)(0) = 0
I know the momentum p, would equal p=(4kg)(2m/s) from p=mv.

But there is no momentum without a force being exerted upon the object. Force is coming from the rotation of the tire via the humans legs rotating a gear (translating an general up and down "force" into a rotational "force", giving the bicycle (the object) a momentum.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This is from the Wikipedia article on Newton's laws of motion
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Newton's_laws_of_motion

1.First law: If an object experiences no net force, then its velocity is constant: the object is either at rest (if its velocity is zero), or it moves in a straight line with constant speed (if its velocity is nonzero).[2][3][4]
2.Second law: The acceleration a of a body is parallel and directly proportional to the net force F acting on the body, is in the direction of the net force, and is inversely proportional to the mass m of the body, i.e., F = ma.
3.Third law: When a first body exerts a force F1 on a second body, the second body simultaneously exerts a force F2 = −F1 on the first body. This means that F1 and F2 are equal in magnitude and opposite in direction.

See if you can apply the correct law(s) to the person pushing on the wall, and to the bicycle.
 
Analog711 said:
But when a person pushes against a wall like in the picture below, there is no acceleration, a=0.
That's only true if there are other forces that result in the net force on the person and the wall summing up to zero. For a simple case that only considers forces originating from the person, the person pushes backwards on the surface of the earth, and forwards on the wall. The surface of the Earth pushes (or pulls) backwards on the wall, and the net sum of forces on the person and the wall is zero.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top