Diffraction, interference, single and double slit setups

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on calculations related to diffraction and interference in single and double slit setups. A participant points out the need to multiply by 3 and correctly apply the sine function in calculations. They mention that for small angles, the approximation of sin(θ) as θ can be used, leading to a specific formula. Another participant confirms a correction to their calculation, initially arriving at 0.30 degrees, while a third participant calculates it as 0.36 degrees. Accurate angle measurements are crucial in understanding diffraction patterns.
Yangi
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
Hey,
due to the corona—virus here in Germany all schools are closed down. Today our teacher gave us two tasks but I'm not sure which formulars I should use.

1.Calculate the Angel below the 3rd.diffraction minimum behind a single slith that's 0.3 mm width. The laserpointer is a red one with a wave length of 630nm.

2.A parallel red light falls through a double slit. Interference appears on a screen that's 3meters away from the lightsource.The distance between the 1st and zero maximum is 4mm. The column spacing d=0,5mm.
Calculate the Wave length of the red light

Thanks in advance
Relevant Equations
I have added a picture with my attempts to find a solution and equations..
-
 

Attachments

  • 51600A51-4579-4A7C-96D7-FC186401F07C.jpeg
    51600A51-4579-4A7C-96D7-FC186401F07C.jpeg
    52.7 KB · Views: 214
Physics news on Phys.org
I think you might have forgotten to multiply by 3 on your calculator for the first part. Also make sure to write ##\theta## in the argument of the ##\sin## function in your working! Also note that for small ##\theta##, we have ##\sin{\theta} \approx \theta## so often we can just use ##\theta = \frac{\lambda}{s}## - though in this case it's small enough that the two are the same to pretty high precision!

I agree with your part 2.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Likes berkeman
Thank your for the fast reply. I corrected the first one now I got 0.30 degree is this right ?
 
Yangi said:
Thank your for the fast reply. I corrected the first one now I got 0.30 degree is this right ?

If you do want to convert it to degrees, I get a value of 0.36 degrees.
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
966
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
8K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
618
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K