Diffusion equation & separation of variables

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around solving the diffusion equation using separation of variables. The original poster presents the equation \(\frac{\partial p}{\partial t}=D\frac{\partial^2 p}{\partial x^2}\) with specific boundary conditions and expresses a desire for the solution to resemble a normal probability density function. However, they encounter difficulties in applying the initial and boundary conditions effectively.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to separate variables and derive equations for \(T(t)\) and \(X(x)\). They question the implications of assuming \(\lambda\) is positive and express uncertainty about how to apply the initial and boundary conditions. Other participants raise concerns about the sufficiency of the initial condition \(p(0,0)=1\) and suggest that a function for \(p(x,0)\) is necessary for a complete solution.

Discussion Status

Participants are exploring different interpretations of the separation constant \(\lambda\) and its implications for the solution. There is a recognition that the initial condition needs clarification, and some guidance has been offered regarding the formulation of the equations based on the sign of \(\lambda\). The discussion is ongoing, with multiple perspectives being considered.

Contextual Notes

There is a lack of explicit information regarding the initial condition \(p(x,0)\), which is critical for solving the problem. Participants also note that the sign of the constant \(D\) is unspecified, adding to the complexity of the solution.

vladimir69
Messages
124
Reaction score
0
hi
i have been trying to solve the diffusion equation using separation of variables. i know the answer should turn out something like the normal probability density function but its just turns into a mess when i try it.
i am given the following information:
[tex]\frac{\partial p}{\partial t}=D\frac{\partial^2 p}{\partial x^2}[/tex]
where [tex]p=p(x,t)[/tex]
[tex]p(0,0)=1[/tex]
[tex]p(L,t)=0[/tex]
[tex]p(-L,t)=0[/tex]
where D is a constant (its not specified whether its negative or positive). it would be safe to say the sign for D which gives the easiest solution is the right one.
now this is what i did
[tex]p(x,t)=T(t)X(x)[/tex]
[tex]X\frac{dT}{dt}=DT\frac{d^2 X}{dx^2}[/tex]
which gives 2 equations, namely
[tex]\frac{1}{DT}\frac{dT}{dt}=\lambda[/tex] (1) and
[tex]\frac{1}{X}\frac{d^2X}{dx^2}=\lambda[/tex] (2)
solving (1) and applying the initial conditions and boundary conditions i get
[tex]T(t)=\exp(D\lambda t)[/tex]
for (2) i assumed [tex]\lambda>0[/tex] to get
[tex]X(x)=a \exp(\sqrt{\lambda}x)+b \exp(-\sqrt{\lambda}x)[/tex]
then finally you plug all back into [tex]p(x,t)=T(t)X(x)[/tex]
now I'm not sure where to go here, or how to apply the initial and boundary conditions and nor can i see how this would end up being something like a normal pdf (with an exp(-x^2) in there somwhere)

thanks in advance
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
vladimir69 said:
hi
i have been trying to solve the diffusion equation using separation of variables. i know the answer should turn out something like the normal probability density function but its just turns into a mess when i try it.
i am given the following information:
[tex]\frac{\partial p}{\partial t}=D\frac{\partial^2 p}{\partial x^2}[/tex]
where [tex]p=p(x,t)[/tex]
[tex]p(0,0)=1[/tex]
[tex]p(L,t)=0[/tex]
[tex]p(-L,t)=0[/tex]
where D is a constant (its not specified whether its negative or positive). it would be safe to say the sign for D which gives the easiest solution is the right one.
now this is what i did
[tex]p(x,t)=T(t)X(x)[/tex]
[tex]X\frac{dT}{dt}=DT\frac{d^2 X}{dx^2}[/tex]
which gives 2 equations, namely
[tex]\frac{1}{DT}\frac{dT}{dt}=\lambda[/tex] (1) and
[tex]\frac{1}{X}\frac{d^2X}{dx^2}=\lambda[/tex] (2)
solving (1) and applying the initial conditions and boundary conditions i get
[tex]T(t)=\exp(D\lambda t)[/tex]
for (2) i assumed [tex]\lambda>0[/tex] to get
[tex]X(x)=a \exp(\sqrt{\lambda}x)+b \exp(-\sqrt{\lambda}x)[/tex]
then finally you plug all back into [tex]p(x,t)=T(t)X(x)[/tex]
now I'm not sure where to go here, or how to apply the initial and boundary conditions and nor can i see how this would end up being something like a normal pdf (with an exp(-x^2) in there somwhere)

thanks in advance

Okay, why did you assume [itex]\lambda[/itex] is positive? What happens if it is negative? Also "p(0,0)= 1" is not sufficient. Initial values for partial differential equations are typically functions: what is p(x,0)? Unless there is a [tex]e^{-x^2}[/tex] in the initial condition you will not get one in the solution to the differential equation!

The general solution will be a sum of the separate solutions:
[tex]\Sigma X(x)T(t)[/tex]
 
i assumed lambda to be positive so that the solution to (2) was an exponential (if its negative then i think the solution involves sin and cos, further i would not know what the solution is if lambda can be positive and negative). i am doing stuff to do with the distribution of random walking particles over a period of time, its behaviour is said to display a normal distribution. i thought i needed a function like p(x,0) but it was not given. could you explain why p(0,0)=1 is not sufficient? is the equation not solvable given the information in the first post?

cheers
 
Last edited:
Firstly, on the positive assumption of $\lambda$...

In this problem, it's usual to take your $\lambda$ (separation constant) as $-\lambda$ and $D$ as, say, $\alpha^2$, then you reqns become:

$\dot{T}+\lambda\alpha^2=0$

and

$\ddot{X}+\lambda\alpha^2X=0$

You should now see that the different signs of (this new) $\lambda$ give constant, normal or hyberbolic trig fn answers.

For you initial condition - you need to specify $p(x,0)=f(x)$ - I guess you want $f(x)=0$ which is fine but you should probably state $0\le x\le L$
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 105 ·
4
Replies
105
Views
11K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K