Digitizing a Boat Hull: Mac26 Modeling Data

  • Context: Misc. 
  • Thread starter Thread starter DaveC426913
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Boat
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around methods for digitizing the hull of a Mac26 boat, focusing on data modeling techniques. Participants explore various approaches for gathering measurements, including photogrammetry, laser measuring tools, and manual methods, while considering the challenges of accuracy and resolution in the modeling process.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests using equally-spaced markers and photography to create cross-sections of the hull.
  • Another proposes constructing an L-shaped frame to take X,Y measurements along the hull.
  • Some participants mention the importance of precision over accuracy in the data model.
  • There are discussions about the potential use of digital tape measures and laser measuring tools for gathering data.
  • Several participants highlight the challenges of measuring the hull due to its shape, including the presence of chines and rub rails.
  • Photogrammetry is mentioned as a viable method, with some noting the availability of software and tutorials for this purpose.
  • One participant recalls a past experience with a stereometric locating system, suggesting that similar technology could be applied to this project.
  • Another participant discusses the use of handheld optical scanners for high-precision measurements, noting the need for markers on the hull for effective scanning.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of ideas and methods for digitizing the boat hull, with no clear consensus on the best approach. Multiple competing views remain regarding the tools and techniques to be used, as well as the importance of accuracy versus precision.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention various limitations, such as the difficulty of accessing certain parts of the hull while on a trailer and the challenges of achieving high precision at oblique angles. There is also uncertainty about the effectiveness of different measurement tools and methods.

Who May Find This Useful

Individuals interested in boat modeling, digital fabrication, or those seeking methods for accurate data collection in complex geometries may find this discussion relevant.

  • #31
.Scott said:
How many data points do you want to collect?
As few as needed.

This is not for widespread consumption. It doesn't need to be centimeter accurate.

Basically, the IRL equivalent of a low poly mesh. Maybe 100 data points, strategically chosen. Basically, until I get sick of lying on the gravel parking lot under my trailer.

I can interpolate from 100 and add curves. And of course only one half of the hull needs doing.

Topsides will actually be the bigger challenge. Much more detail
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
How about a big contour gauge thingy used in conjunction with a laser level line and maybe a bubble level on the gauge. I remember seeing a 50 cm long one once. Still damned tedious though.
 
  • #33
I recommend Meshroom because I like the name.
 
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: Tom.G
  • #34
There are Mac26X hull photos here.
https://www.boatsonline.com.au/boats-for-sale/used/trailer-boats/macgregor-26x/281571
The hull lines appear to have been developed from flat sheets, so only the several chines, keel, and gunwale on one side need be measured. The surface is simply ruled straight between each pair of adjacent lines.

Park your boat next to a brick wall. Mark points about one or two feet apart, along the lines where the sheets were joined. Note the step profile at the joints. Measure the position of those points from the wall and from the ground. That gives the hull lines.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
11K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
17
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K