Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Dimension of direct sum axler

  1. Jun 24, 2012 #1
    Exercise #17 in Linear Algebra done right is to prove that the dimension of the direct sum of subspaces of V is equal to the sum of the dimensions of the individual subspaces. I have been trying to figure this out for a few days now and I'm really stuck. Here's what I have got so far:

    Choose a base of each of the subspaces and combine them in one list which clearly spans V and has the length we are looking for. Now we just have to show that this list is linearly independent.

    If this list is not linearly independent than one of the vectors is in the span of the previous vectors. If I could show that this vector must be in the span of one of the other bases, then that would prove the result but I can't quite figure out how to get there. Any help would be greatly appreciated.
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Jun 24, 2012 #2


    Let's do it for two subspaces as this summarizes the logical argument: suppose [itex]A:=\{v_1,...,v_k\}\,\,,\,\,B:=\{w_1,...,w_r\}\,[/itex] are basis resp. of subspaces [itex]\,U,W\leq V\,\,,\,\,with\,\,\,U\cap W=\{0\}[/itex].

    Suppose one of the vectors in [itex]\,\{v_1,...,v_k,w_1,...,w_r\}\,[/itex] depends linearly on the preceeding ones. Then this must be

    one of the [itex]\,w_i\,[/itex]'s (why?) , so [tex]\,w_i\in Span\{v_1,...,v_k,w_1,...,w_{i-1}\}\,\Longrightarrow w_i=a_1v_1+...+a_kv_k+b_1w_1+...+b_{i-1}w_{i-1}[/tex] We then get [tex]a_1v_1+...+a_kv_k=-b_1w_1-...-b_{i-1}w_{i-1}+w_i\in V\cap W=\{0\}[/tex]

    From here, [itex]\,a_1v_1+...+a_kv_k=0=-b_1w_1-...-b_{i-1}w_{i-1}+w_i\,[/itex] , from where we reach at once our contradiction.

    DonAntonio
     
  4. Jun 25, 2012 #3

    HallsofIvy

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor

    As stated, you can't prove this, it isn't true. It is true and you can prove it if you add the condition that the only vector contained in both subspaces is the 0 vector. Of course, your proof will have to use that condition.

    If they were not you could construct a non-zero vector that is in both subspaces.
     
  5. Jun 25, 2012 #4


    This condition is implicit in the direct sum thing: cero must be the intersection of any space and the sum of all the others, otherwise the sum is not direct.

    Donantonio

     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook




Similar Discussions: Dimension of direct sum axler
  1. Direct Sum (Replies: 4)

Loading...