Dipole moment of sphere with uniform volume charge Q

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The dipole moment \(\mathbf{p}\) of a sphere with a uniform volume charge \(Q\) is definitively zero. This conclusion arises from the symmetry of the charge distribution, where the charge density \(\rho(\mathbf{r})\) is constant within the sphere and even about the origin. The integral for the dipole moment, \(\mathbf{p}=\int \mathbf{r} \rho(\mathbf{r}) d\tau\), results in cancellation of contributions from opposite points in the sphere, confirming that \(\mathbf{p} = 0\). Evaluating the integral for one component, such as \(p_z\), demonstrates this through symmetry, as shown in the discussion.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of dipole moments in electrostatics
  • Familiarity with triple integrals in spherical coordinates
  • Knowledge of symmetry in physical systems
  • Basic concepts of charge density and volume charge distributions
NEXT STEPS
  • Learn about the mathematical derivation of dipole moments in electrostatics
  • Study spherical coordinates and their application in triple integrals
  • Explore the concept of charge symmetry and its implications in electrostatics
  • Investigate other charge distributions and their corresponding dipole moments
USEFUL FOR

Students studying electrostatics, physicists interested in charge distributions, and educators teaching concepts of dipole moments and symmetry in physics.

Saraphim
Messages
46
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Determine the dipole moment, \mathbf{p}, of a sphere of radius R with a uniform volume charge, total Q, with respect to its center.

Homework Equations


\mathbf{p}=\int \mathbf{r} \rho(\mathbf{r}) d\tau

The Attempt at a Solution


I know that \mathbf{p}=\mathbf{0}, but I have a hard time finding a rigorous argument to prove it. Looking at the definition of \mathbf{p} given above, all I can see is that \rho(\mathbf{r}) is in fact constant for r<R, but this doesn't seem to get me anywhere. Other than "it's not a dipole", I'm stuck. Can anyone point me in the right direction?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's zero because rho is even about the origin ( i.e. rho(-r) = rho(r)), while the components of r are odd (i.e.z(-r) = -z(r)), so when you carry out the integral there are equal parts + and -, so it all cancels. If you don't believe it, try carrying out the integral for one of the components, say z. Can you write the integral for Pz in a form that you can evaluate it?
 
I think so, but I'm not sure how to argue from one dimension to three dimensions. I do get the explanation intuitively, though.

I think the integral you are suggesting is as simple as:

p_z=\int_{-R}^{R} z\rho dz=\rho(\frac{1}{2}R^2-\frac{1}{2} R^2)=0

Is this correct?
 
No, not really. You still have to integrate over the whole volume of the sphere, so it's really:
p_z = \int_0^{2\pi}\int_0^{\pi}\int_0^Rz r^2 sin(\theta)dr d\theta d\phi
Since z = r cos(theta), this can be written:
p_z = \int_0^{2\pi}\int_0^{\pi}\int_0^R r^3 cos(\theta)sin(\theta)dr d\theta d\phi
Can you evaluate this?
 
Aha, yes of course! I was having a problem just replacing r for z in the triple integral, so I thought you meant the other way, even though I couldn't find my way from there. I now see that by superposition, I just evaluate the integral for each of r's components, then sum them.

So the idea is that evaluating one of those triple integrals and getting zero really shows that it will be zero for the other components as well, by symmetry. Thank you!
 
Yes, or you could explicitly evaluate the other components as well (x = r sin(theta)cos(phi), y = r sin(theta)sin(phi)), and show that they are zero.
 
Thanks, I feel silly for even asking the question now, it just seems obvious. ^_^
 
Glad to help. As they say, "The only stupid question is the one that is not asked."
 

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
Replies
23
Views
4K
Replies
11
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
1K