Dipole moment of sphere with uniform volume charge Q

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around determining the dipole moment of a uniformly charged sphere with total charge Q and radius R. The original poster attempts to understand why the dipole moment is zero and seeks a rigorous argument to support this conclusion.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the symmetry of the charge distribution and its implications for the dipole moment. The original poster questions how to rigorously prove that the dipole moment is zero, while others suggest evaluating integrals and considering the even and odd properties of the functions involved.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on evaluating the integral for the dipole moment and have pointed out the importance of symmetry in the problem. There is an ongoing exploration of the mathematical reasoning behind the zero dipole moment, with various approaches being discussed.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the transition from one-dimensional reasoning to three-dimensional integrals, highlighting the complexity of the problem. There is an emphasis on evaluating integrals over the entire volume of the sphere, and assumptions about the symmetry of the charge distribution are being examined.

Saraphim
Messages
46
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Determine the dipole moment, [tex]\mathbf{p}[/tex], of a sphere of radius R with a uniform volume charge, total Q, with respect to its center.

Homework Equations


[tex]\mathbf{p}=\int \mathbf{r} \rho(\mathbf{r}) d\tau[/tex]

The Attempt at a Solution


I know that [tex]\mathbf{p}=\mathbf{0}[/tex], but I have a hard time finding a rigorous argument to prove it. Looking at the definition of [tex]\mathbf{p}[/tex] given above, all I can see is that [tex]\rho(\mathbf{r})[/tex] is in fact constant for r<R, but this doesn't seem to get me anywhere. Other than "it's not a dipole", I'm stuck. Can anyone point me in the right direction?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's zero because rho is even about the origin ( i.e. rho(-r) = rho(r)), while the components of r are odd (i.e.z(-r) = -z(r)), so when you carry out the integral there are equal parts + and -, so it all cancels. If you don't believe it, try carrying out the integral for one of the components, say z. Can you write the integral for Pz in a form that you can evaluate it?
 
I think so, but I'm not sure how to argue from one dimension to three dimensions. I do get the explanation intuitively, though.

I think the integral you are suggesting is as simple as:

[tex]p_z=\int_{-R}^{R} z\rho dz=\rho(\frac{1}{2}R^2-\frac{1}{2} R^2)=0[/tex]

Is this correct?
 
No, not really. You still have to integrate over the whole volume of the sphere, so it's really:
[tex]p_z = \int_0^{2\pi}\int_0^{\pi}\int_0^Rz r^2 sin(\theta)dr d\theta d\phi[/tex]
Since z = r cos(theta), this can be written:
[tex]p_z = \int_0^{2\pi}\int_0^{\pi}\int_0^R r^3 cos(\theta)sin(\theta)dr d\theta d\phi[/tex]
Can you evaluate this?
 
Aha, yes of course! I was having a problem just replacing r for z in the triple integral, so I thought you meant the other way, even though I couldn't find my way from there. I now see that by superposition, I just evaluate the integral for each of r's components, then sum them.

So the idea is that evaluating one of those triple integrals and getting zero really shows that it will be zero for the other components as well, by symmetry. Thank you!
 
Yes, or you could explicitly evaluate the other components as well (x = r sin(theta)cos(phi), y = r sin(theta)sin(phi)), and show that they are zero.
 
Thanks, I feel silly for even asking the question now, it just seems obvious. ^_^
 
Glad to help. As they say, "The only stupid question is the one that is not asked."
 

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
6K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
Replies
23
Views
5K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K