Dipole term in multipole expansion

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the dipole term in multipole expansion as described in Griffiths' work. The potential is expressed using Legendre polynomials, specifically through the integral involving the dipole moment vector, defined as \vec{p}=\int \vec{r}^{'}\rho dv^{'}. The confusion arises regarding the appearance of the cosine of the angle in the potential when using the scalar product of the dipole moment vector. Clarification is provided that the cosine is inherent in the definition of the dot product, where \vec{r}^{'}\cdot\hat{r} = r'\cos(\theta'), thus aligning with the original expression.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of multipole expansion in electrostatics
  • Familiarity with Legendre polynomials
  • Knowledge of vector calculus, specifically dot products
  • Basic concepts of electric potential and dipole moments
NEXT STEPS
  • Study Griffiths' "Introduction to Electrodynamics" for detailed explanations on multipole expansions
  • Explore vector calculus applications in physics, focusing on dot products and their geometric interpretations
  • Investigate the role of Legendre polynomials in solving electrostatic problems
  • Learn about the physical significance of dipole moments in various fields, including electromagnetism and molecular chemistry
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those studying electromagnetism, as well as educators seeking to clarify concepts related to multipole expansions and dipole moments.

assed
Messages
26
Reaction score
1
Hi.
I'm having some difficult in understanding something about the dipole term in a multipole expansion. Griffiths writes the expansion as a sum of terms in Legendre polynomials, so the dipole term in the potential is writen

\frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon r^{2}}\int r^{'}cos\theta^{'}\rho dv^{'}

Then, by defining

\vec{p}=\int \vec{r}^{'}\rho dv^{'}

he writes

V=\frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon}\frac{\vec{p}\cdot\hat{r}}{r^{2}}

I understood how that's done. My problem is: using the dipole moment vector and doing the scalar product it will usually appear the cossine of an angle in the potential, but it will never appear using the first definition , that is, calculating directly the integral. Maybe I understood something wrong but I can't figure out what. Hope someone helps me. Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm not sure I understood the question. The cosine is already there in the original definition: it's why the dot product is used below.

##\vec{p}\cdot\hat{r} = \int \vec{r}^{'}\rho dv^{'} \cdot \hat{r} = \int \vec{r}^{'}\cdot \hat{r} \rho dv^{'}##

Griffiths has defined ##\theta'## as the angle between ##\vec{r}## and ##\vec{r}'##, so ##\vec{r}^{'}\cdot \hat{r} = |\vec{r}^{'}|\hat{r}|\cos(\theta') = r'\cos(\theta')##, giving back the original expression. Are you misinterpreting ##\theta'## as the polar angle? Look again at the diagram (Fig. 3.28 in my edition).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
995
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K