Dirac delta function / Gibbs entropy

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
1 reply · 3K views
Silversonic
Messages
121
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



This is an issue I'm having with understanding a section of maths rather than a coursework question. I have a stage of the density function on the full phase space ρ(p,x);

[itex]ρ(p,x) = \frac {1}{\Omega(E)} \delta (\epsilon(p,x) - E)[/itex]

where [itex]\epsilon(p,x)[/itex] is the Hamiltonian.

Then the logarithm of that is taken to obtain;

[itex]ln(ρ(p,x)) = -ln(\Omega (E)) + ln(\delta (\epsilon(p,x) - E))[/itex]

And then both sides are multiplied by ρ(p,x) and integrated over the phase space

[itex]∫ρ(p,x)ln(ρ(p,x))dpdx = -ln(\Omega (E))∫ρ(p,x)dpdx + ln(\delta (\epsilon(p,x) - E))∫ρ(p,x)dpdx[/itex]

The term ∫ρ(p,x)dpdx equals one clearly, and the term on the LHS stays as it is. And [itex]ln(\Omega (E)) = S[/itex] (omitting the Boltzmann constant for the moment [S = S/k]).


However my textbook completely negates the [itex]ln(\delta (\epsilon(p,x) - E))[/itex] term, the dirac delta function. As if it goes to zero. Leaving us with;

[itex]S = -∫ρ(p,x)ln(ρ(p,x))dpdx[/itex]

Why can we do this? Why is that term equal to zero? I understand the function of the dirac delta function, δ(x) is zero anywhere else except x = 0, where it is equal to infinity. The intergal of the dirac delta function over all space is equal to one. So why then does [itex]ln(\delta (\epsilon(p,x) - E))[/itex] equal zero? That makes little sense to me, where [itex]\epsilon(p,x)[/itex] is not equal to zero, then we're logging the number zero, and when it's equal to E, we're logging infinity. Neither case makes much sense, so why can we omit it/ say it is equal to zero?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Silversonic said:
[itex]ρ(p,x) = \frac {1}{\Omega(E)} \delta (\epsilon(p,x) - E)[/itex]

I'm not sure how to handle the dirac delta function here either.

Usually the microcanonical distribution is defined in such a way as to allow for a small uncertainty in the total energy E. So, instead of an energy surface in phase space, you deal with a very thin energy “slab” of thickness dE. Then the density of states would be [itex]ρ(p,x) = \frac {1}{\Omega(E,dE)} \Delta (p,x)[/itex] where [itex]\Delta (p,x)[/itex] has the value 1 if ##(p,x)## lies in the slab and 0 otherwise. ##\Omega(E,dE)## is the volume in phase space of the slab. So, [itex]\Delta (p,x)[/itex] would take the place of the dirac delta function.

Now, [itex]∫ρ(p,x)ln(ρ(p,x))dpdx[/itex] should give you what you want. But this doesn't really answer your question of how to do it directly with the dirac-delta function.