Undergrad Dirac delta function in 2d polar coordinates

Click For Summary
In the discussion about the Dirac delta function in 2D polar coordinates, it is established that the divergence of the vector field in 2D yields a factor of 2π for the delta function, analogous to the 3D case which yields 4π. The expressions provided are clarified as not being coordinate-dependent, emphasizing the importance of understanding the delta function as a functional. The divergence theorem is suggested as a method to verify these results through integration over a circle or sphere. The conversation also highlights a potential misquotation of a reference text, indicating that the original expression was indeed correct. Overall, the discussion reinforces the mathematical consistency of the delta function across different dimensions.
Trollfaz
Messages
143
Reaction score
14
In 3 d spherical coordinates we know that
$$\triangledown \cdot \frac{\hat{\textbf{r}}}{r^2}=4π\delta^3(\textbf{r})$$
Integration over all## R^3## is 4π
So when we remove the third dimensions and enter 2d polar coordinates then
$$\triangledown \cdot \frac{\hat{\textbf{r}}}{r}=2π\delta^2(\textbf{r})$$
So the integral over ##R^2## is 2π?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
First of all, note that your expressions are not written in any particular coordinates (apart from the interpretation of ##r## as a coordinate function and ##\hat{\boldsymbol r}## as the corresponding unit vector. In particular, the delta functions are not the product of the coordinate delta functions.

Apart from that: Yes. You can easily check the result by use of the divergence theorem and integration over a sphere/circle. In fact, that is one way to find the constant factors in front.
 
I'm quoting the first expression from Introductions to Electrodynamics (David J. Griffiths) Section 1.5.3, Eqn 1.99
$$\triangle \cdot \frac{\hat{r}}{r^2}=4π\delta^3(r)$$
 
Trollfaz said:
I'm quoting the first expression from Introductions to Electrodynamics (David J. Griffiths) Section 1.5.3, Eqn 1.99
$$\triangle \cdot \frac{\hat{r}}{r^2}=4π\delta^3(r)$$
You are missing the point (and hopefully misquoting Griffiths as the expression as written here makes no sense). The expression in your OP was correct. My comment was that it was not really something dependent on using spherical coordinates.
 
right, integral in ##R^3-B_\epsilon(0)##, and use divergence thm

if your are curious about the equation everypoint (specially point 0), that is Dirac delta, try to understand it as a functional like ##<\delta, \varphi>##, that is ## \int \limits_{R^3} \delta \varphi ##
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
6K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K