How Does Dirac Delta Substitution Relate to Helmholtz's Decomposition Theorem?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the relationship between Dirac delta substitution and Helmholtz's Decomposition Theorem, specifically the equality $$\delta(x-y) = - (4 \pi)^{-1} \nabla^{2} \frac{1}{\vert x - y \vert}$$. Participants clarify that the right-hand side behaves as a delta function under integration, particularly when applying the divergence theorem. The equation is valid in the context of distributions, where the delta function is defined as a linear functional on test functions. Understanding this relationship requires recognizing the right-hand side as the Green's function for the operator -Δ.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of distributions and test functions in mathematical analysis.
  • Familiarity with Helmholtz's Decomposition Theorem.
  • Knowledge of Green's functions and their applications in differential equations.
  • Proficiency in vector calculus, particularly the divergence theorem.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of distributions, focusing on the Dirac delta function.
  • Learn about Green's functions and their role in solving partial differential equations.
  • Explore Helmholtz's Decomposition Theorem in greater detail, including its applications in physics.
  • Investigate the divergence theorem and its implications in various dimensions.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and engineering professionals interested in advanced calculus, particularly those working with differential equations and theoretical physics concepts.

muzialis
Messages
156
Reaction score
1
Hi All,

I found (Wikipedia page on Helmotz's decomposition theorem) the follwoing equality, which puzzles me:
$$\delta(x-y) = - (4 \pi)^{-1} \nabla^{2} \frac{1}{\vert x - y \vert}$$
I am not sure I understand, the r.h.s seems to me a proper function. The page mentions this a sa position, not an approximation, can maybe anuvboy help?

Many thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The right hand side is a function which has a singularity when x=y. For fixed y, if you "apply the divergence theorem" (which depending on the exact statement that you use may or may not actually apply) to the right hand side you integrating over a ball you will see that you get 1 if your sphere contains y, and 0 if your sphere does not contain y, which is the inspiration for this (in particular, the right hand side functions exactly as the delta function when it's under an integral sign).
 
Office_shredder,

I clearly see your point. I am still puzzled by the notation, as the equality sign seems to me an abuse.

Thank you very much

Best Regards
 
The equation is correct, but it has to be understood properly, namely in the sense of distributions. The \delta distribution is defined as a linear functional on an appropriate space of test functions (e.g., the C^{\infty} functions with compact support or Schwartz's space of quickly falling C^{\infty} functions) by
\int_{\mathbb{R}^3} \mathrm{d}^3 \vec{y} \delta^{(3)}(\vec{x}-\vec{y}) f(\vec{y})=f(\vec{x}).
In this sense you have to read the equation. To prove it, you must show that for any test function
\int_{\mathbb{R}^3} \mathrm{d}^3 \vec{x} f(\vec{y}) \left (-\Delta_{\vec{x}} \frac{1}{4 \pi |\vec{x}-\vec{y}|} \right )=f(\vec{x}),
which is not entirely trivial.

The intuitive physicist's way to understand it is that
G(\vec{x},\vec{y})=\frac{1}{4 \pi |\vec{x}-\vec{y}|}
is (read as function of \vec{x}) the electric potential of a unit-point charge located at \vec{y}, fulfilling the equation (valid in Heaviside-Lorentz units)
\Delta_{\vec{x}} G(\vec{x},\vec{y})=-\rho(\vec{x})=-\delta^{(3)}(\vec{x}-\vec{y}).
In other words, it's the Green's function of the differential operator -\Delta.
 
Office_shredder,

it looks like I have understood less than what I thought...
Your explanation made perfect sense until I tried a direct computation.
For simplicity in 1D, I fixed y = 1.
Then, if I understood, the indicated function should behave as a delta-distributuion under the integral sign.
As $$\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \delta \mathrm{d}x = 1$$ the same should be expected for the mentioned function, which in 1D behaves as $$\frac{1}{(x-y)^{4}}$$ and is hence not even integrable.
I thought this might be a problem related to the 1D setting.
I tried in 2D then, using the divergence theorem now
$$\int_{V} \nabla^{2} \frac{1}{\vert x -y \vert} \mathrm{d}V = ..$$
and then I got lost...

Could you please possibly expand on your explanation?
thanks a lot, much appreciated
 
PS: I think I might be closer now...I just realized what was in front of me clearly, that the fraction is the Green's function for the operator nabla^2, am I right? Thanks a lot to all
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
4K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
7K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K