Dirac's 1958 lecture on spinors

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter grzz
  • Start date Start date
grzz
Messages
1,031
Reaction score
26
Are there any sources for the set of Dirac’s Cambridge lectures in early 1958, which had a huge and very specific impact on Penrose’s thinking about 2-component spinors?
Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Moderator's note: Several off topic posts have been deleted.
 
From https://www.nobelprize.org/uploads/2024/02/penrose-lecture.pdf
Black Holes, Cosmology and Space-Time Singularities
Nobel Lecture, December 8, 2020 by
Roger Penrose, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.

(pp.63-64)
The area that I thought might be helpful was the theory of 2-component
spinors. I should explain that I finally understood properly about
2-spinors from lectures by the great quantum physicist Paul Dirac, earlier
in the spring of 1958, in the academic year before Finkelstein’s lecture.
Dirac’s course was basically on quantum field theory, but he appeared to
have deviated from his normal course when he talked about 2-spinors. He
was famous for discovering the dynamical equation for the electron, but
this originally involved the introduction of 4-spinors. However, you can
break each of them down into a pair of 2-spinors and Dirac had become
well acquainted with this fact, having written an important paper [6]
describing higher-spin fields in these terms. Yet, these techniques were
not very familiar to most physicists at that time. I had myself heard of
2-spinors and had been intrigued by them, but I did not really understand
them until Dirac’s lectures had made them abundantly clear to me!
.
.
.
(p.94)
[6] Dirac, P.A.M. (1936) Relativistic wave equations. Proc. Roy. Soc. (Lond.) A155, 447–59.

You can read this 1936 Dirac reference here:
https://royalsocietypublishing.org/rspa/article/155/886/447/5392/Relativistic-wave-equations
 
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: Sagittarius A-Star

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
841
  • · Replies 50 ·
2
Replies
50
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K