How can I solve the problem with Fourier transforms in critical phenomena?

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on solving a problem related to Fourier transforms in critical phenomena, specifically transitioning from equation 7.37 to 7.38. Participants suggest using the convolution theorem, which states that the product of functions in Fourier space corresponds to a convolution in direct space. Confusion arises regarding the arguments of functions in equation 7.38, particularly why they differ from those outside the integral. Clarifications emphasize that in homogeneous systems, functions depend on the difference of variables rather than their individual values. The conversation concludes with advice on renaming variables to align with the convolution representation.
enrikofermi
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Hi all.
I'm learning something about critical phenomena and I have one problem.

I'm bad with Fourier transforms so I don't know how from 7.37 we have 7.38.
I have tryed everything I knew, but fruitless. I have attached picture of my problem.

Does anybody has any idea how I can solve this?
 

Attachments

  • IMG988.jpg
    IMG988.jpg
    67.1 KB · Views: 518
Physics news on Phys.org
Multiply 7.37 with the denominator of the RHS and then Fourier transform using that a product in Fourier space becomes a convolution in direct space (and vice versa), i.e. the integral on the RHS of eq. 7.38.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Convolution_theorem
 
Thanks!
Is the Fourier transform of C (with hat) just C without hat, taking into account deffinition of C?
What make me confused are the arguments of functions in 7.38. Why r-r', and so on...?
 
Anybody? To help with this manybody? :)
 
That C and ##\hat{C}## are Fourier transforms of each other is clearly stated in the article.
r1-r2 is as valid a variable as e.g. x or y. In a homogeneous system, translation invariant quantities cannot depend on both r1 and r2 but via their difference r1-r2. I suppose this has been discussed in your text previously
 
Yes, I know, it was discussed earlier. But that what confused me was arguments of those functions under integral. Why are they different? And why they differ from those arguments of function outside of integral?
 
I think you first have to convince yourself that the integral represents a convolution.
 
I have used convolution theorem, but I didn't get exactly same solution as author. Look how I calculated that. Arguments of my functions are considerably different. And that is what confuses me...
 

Attachments

  • IMG1000.jpg
    IMG1000.jpg
    25.7 KB · Views: 500
Rename your variables:
r->r-r'
And
r''->r''-r'
 
  • Like
Likes enrikofermi
  • #10
Thank you very much Doc!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
569
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
2K