B Direction of Electric Field & Field Due to a Dipole

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the confusion regarding the direction of the electric field (EF) and dipole moment. It is established that the EF direction is from positive to negative charges, while the dipole moment is defined from negative to positive charges. When analyzing an axial point of a dipole, the EF aligns with the dipole moment, leading to confusion about the established conventions. The conversation suggests that understanding field lines as emanating from positive charges can clarify this issue. Additionally, in dielectrics, the internal dipole field opposes the external field, further complicating the interpretation of these concepts.
warhammer
Messages
164
Reaction score
33
TL;DR Summary
EF direction- Taken Positive to Negative
But EF due to a Dipole on Axial Point - Along Direction of Dipole Moment i.e. From Negative to Positive. Why so?
Hi all. I am stuck with a seemingly silly doubt all of a sudden.

The direction of Electric Field is taken from Positive to Negative (because Field Lines originate from a Positive Charge and terminate at Negative Charge).

We know that direction of Dipole Moment is from Negative Charge to a Positive Charge. Now when we consider a axial point for this Dipole case, we find that the Electric Field is along the direction of Dipole Moment (i.e. from Negative to Positive Charge).

I'm not sure how this is possible at all. From the already established convention the Electric Field should be opposite to the direction of Dipole Moment, running from Positive Charge to Terminating at Negative Charge.

In addition to this, what happens in case of Polarisation in Dielectrics, when we take the Internal Dipole Field from Positive to Negative only (in such a way that it tries to mitigate the externally applied field and opposite to it).

I need some help in overcoming this misconception. It's giving me a really really hard time! 🙏🏻
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Just have a look at the field lines:

480px-VFPt_dipoles_electric.svg.png


https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/...ric.svg#/media/File:VFPt_dipoles_electric.svg

Taken from the Wikipedia article on the electric dipole:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electric_dipole_moment
 
  • Like
Likes PeroK, warhammer and Dale
warhammer said:
Summary: EF direction- Taken Positive to Negative
But EF due to a Dipole on Axial Point - Along Direction of Dipole Moment i.e. From Negative to Positive. Why so?

We know that direction of Dipole Moment is from Negative Charge to a Positive Charge. Now when we consider a axial point for this Dipole case, we find that the Electric Field is along the direction of Dipole Moment (i.e. from Negative to Positive Charge).
Take the upper right diagram that @vanhees71 posted as the prototype. All of the field lines go away from the positive charge.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71 and warhammer
vanhees71 said:
So in essence, one should just think about Field Lines as emanating outwards from a positive charge instead of abovementioned conventions as they lead to confusion?

I think this way I can resolve the three mental conundrums.

  1. Field is always treated as outwards from a positive charge
  2. Since field is outwards from a positive charge, we see that Dipole Moment and Field are indeed in same direction for an Axial Point
  3. Positive Charge Centers are swayed along the direction of External EF in a dielectric material. If we treat Charges hugging at the boundary of a rectangular slab, with positive charges along the direction of external field, then for the "insides" of the slab the internal field would again be directed away from the positive charge (which essentially is opposite to the direction of external field)
Is this a cleaner way to look at things?
 
The "physical dipole" (@vanhees71 's upper right diagram), which consists of a pair of equal-magnitude oppositely-sign charges ##q## and ##-q## separated by a fixed displacement ##\vec d##,
is a model of the "pure dipole" (@vanhees71 's upper left diagram).

This model is a good model as ##|\vec r|\rightarrow \infty## ("asymptotically")
(or ##|\vec d|\rightarrow 0## and ##q\rightarrow\infty## while keeping ##q\vec d## fixed),
but not as good otherwise.
 
warhammer said:
But EF due to a Dipole on Axial Point - Along Direction of Dipole Moment i.e. From Negative to Positive. Why so?
Can you provide a sketch of the situation. Is your axial point inside or outside the dipole? Is it closer to the negatively charged side of the dipole, or the positively charged side?
 
Hello! Let's say I have a cavity resonant at 10 GHz with a Q factor of 1000. Given the Lorentzian shape of the cavity, I can also drive the cavity at, say 100 MHz. Of course the response will be very very weak, but non-zero given that the Loretzian shape never really reaches zero. I am trying to understand how are the magnetic and electric field distributions of the field at 100 MHz relative to the ones at 10 GHz? In particular, if inside the cavity I have some structure, such as 2 plates...
Back
Top