Disabling Op-Amp ICs - Is Cutting Supply or Ground OK?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jdo300
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Op-amp
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the implications of disabling an op-amp IC, specifically the LM358, by cutting its supply or ground line while still allowing input signals to be connected. Participants explore the effects on both bipolar and FET op-amps, considering the potential risks and design strategies involved.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Jason questions whether cutting the supply or ground line of an op-amp IC would harm it while input signals remain connected, expressing uncertainty about the behavior of bipolar versus FET op-amps.
  • Mike suggests that most devices can tolerate some current into their signal pins and recommends keeping the current below 0.25 mA to avoid damage when power is removed, providing specific resistor values for different signal voltages.
  • Another participant points out that some op-amps come with a dedicated disable function, referencing a specific model and its application in video multiplexing.
  • A warning is raised regarding CMOS FET op-amps and the risk of "CMOS Latchup," emphasizing the need to keep input voltages within specified limits to prevent destructive currents.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the safety and implications of disabling op-amps by cutting power lines, with some advocating for caution and others sharing experiences that suggest it may be acceptable under certain conditions. No consensus is reached on the best approach.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention the lack of specific guidance in data sheets regarding the tolerance of op-amps to input signals when powered down, indicating a reliance on practical experience and design considerations.

Jdo300
Messages
548
Reaction score
5
Hi All,

I have a quick question for you. If you have a garden variety op-amp IC like the LM358 and you want to disable the output of the op-amp (assuming single supply operation), would it hurt it to "disable" it by cutting the supply or ground line to the IC assuming that signals can still be connected to the inputs? I'm *assuming* that incoming signals would not affect the IC if it were a FET op-amp but I'm not sure about the bipolar ones.

Thanks,
Jason O
 
Engineering news on Phys.org


Hello Jason,

Most devices will tolerate a bit of current into their signal pins - i.e. driving them from an excessive source. The trick is to have a feel for how much, and insure that you have enough series resistance to keep from damaging the amp while power is removed. As a rule of thumb, I typically keep it at .25ma or less, though older amps with less delicate transistors would likely take much more.

If your signal gets to 12v, than 47K between your op amp and signal would keep you safe. For a 5 volt signal, 20K works.

Note that there are a fair number of guys who will argue that this isn't neccesarily valid because they haven't found it on the data sheet. But then, all of us are guilty of designing circuits in which op amps have been tortured by power supply start up timing, and settling in other ciruits. In those cases, I guess ignorance was bliss ; )

Best of Luck,

Mike
 


Haha thanks for the tips mike. :smile:
 


A word of warning if you try this with CMOS FET op-amps: there is an effect called "CMOS Latchup" which can result in the chip taking destructively high supply currents if the inputs are taken outside the supply rail voltages.

Manufacturers typically specify all voltages to be less than 0.3V beyond the supplies- you should try to arrange resistors in your input circuit to guarantee that. This may require shunt as well as series resistors to be added - and if so you would have to allow for their effects on normal operation.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
6K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 50 ·
2
Replies
50
Views
8K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
10K