Discovering a Protein's Primary Structure: Methods and Strategies

  • Thread starter Thread starter mather
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Structure
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around methods and strategies for determining the primary structure of proteins, particularly focusing on the challenges of predicting sequences based on physical and chemical properties, as well as the limitations of current techniques.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant inquires about available methods to determine a protein's primary structure and seeks guidance on how to start the process.
  • Another participant references a website that outlines methods for determining protein sequences, but this is met with disagreement regarding its relevance.
  • Some participants discuss the role of genomic information and mass spectrometry in predicting protein sequences from nucleotide sequences.
  • A participant proposes a hypothetical scenario where they provide physical properties of a peptide and questions whether its sequence can be predicted from that information.
  • Another participant explains the complexity of identifying pentapeptides due to the vast number of possible combinations and emphasizes the necessity of crystallization and X-ray diffraction for accurate determination.
  • There is a discussion about the feasibility of computationally generating a crystal structure based on known physical and chemical properties, with questions about the limitations of such an approach.
  • Clarifications are sought regarding whether the original inquiry pertains to identifying a peptide from a sample or designing a peptide with specific properties.
  • One participant expresses interest in designing a peptide to achieve certain physical or chemical properties, acknowledging the challenges involved.
  • Another participant suggests a resource that may provide relevant information for the design of peptides.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the relevance of certain methods and resources, indicating that the discussion contains multiple competing perspectives and remains unresolved regarding the best approach to predict protein sequences based on limited information.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations related to the availability of samples, the need for crystallization, and the challenges of computational predictions, which may depend on various assumptions and definitions.

mather
Messages
146
Reaction score
0
hello!

what are the available methods to determine the sequence (primary structure) of a protein?

from where one can start (what info he can gather) and how he can deduce the primary structure?

thanks!
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
sorry, not even close to what I am asking
 
Perhaps if you could explain a bit more in detail what you need, it could be helpful.

The previously mentioned site notes that the advent of large amounts of genomic information has made it possible to predict protein sequences based on the corresponding nucleotie sequence. Also, mass spectrometry has been tremendously helpful in this area - see, for example, this perspective/review article.
 
if I give you the volume of the peptide (let's only talk about small peptides), the charge/polarity/hydrophobicity of the various parts of its surface, its precise dimensions, will you be able to predict its sequence?

if not, why?
if not, is there anything else you would need to do it?
 
If we say that there are 20 common amino acids, and only 20, and that they always link in the same way (e.g. no gamma-gln linkages) then there are 3.2 million pentapeptides. There is only one possible way that you can use the physical and/or chemical properties to identify anyone of those pentapeptides in an intact molecule: prepare a suitable crystal of the material, and determine its crystal structure by X-ray diffraction (minimum of a month of research if you are familiar with the techniques and fortunate enough to find a way to prepare the crystal). Otherwise, destructive techniques are always necessary. Obviously those that require only a small amount of material are preferable. The Edman degradation does lend itself to automation.

Sequencing methods that are used in practice are just exactly those that are described in the U Wisconsin article linked above.
 
I don't have the protein or I cannot crystalize it

is there a workaround?

can I "generate computationally" a crystal, given its physical/chemical properties (which is what I only know) and then computationally again hit it with x-ray and determine its sequence?
 
OK, the way your original post seems to read is "Suppose I have here a sample of a protein. How could I find out its sequence?"

It is now sounding like you are asking something a little different.

The X-ray diffraction technique depends on measuring the angular position and intensity of x-ray "spots" that you can find with a photon detector when you shine a beam of X-rays onto a small crystal of a substance.

If you do not know the sequence of a peptide, there is no way of telling where these spots will be theoretically. In fact, to predict the positions of the diffraction spots you would also need to know the secondary structure, and the way that a large number of molecules could make a regular packing.

If you do not have the peptide, there is no way that you could say accurately enough what any of its physical or chemical properties might be anyway.

So are you trying to identify a small peptide that you have a sample of? Or design a small peptide to have a particular physical or chemical property? Or to work out what some of the physical or chemical properties of a particular small peptide with a known sequence?
 
mather said:
sorry, not even close to what I am asking

Uh, what? You asked about methods of determining primary structure. I gave you a link with three distinct methods of doing just that. If you're changing your question, you could have just clarified and said that instead of implying my reading comprehension sucks when your initial question was clear as crystal.
 
  • #10
JohnRC said:
So are you trying to identify a small peptide that you have a sample of?

no, since I don't have sample of the peptide (I just know some of its physical/chemical properties, and maybe some parts of its sequence or maybe that some specific aminoacids are not present in the sequence, etc)

JohnRC said:
Or design a small peptide to have a particular physical or chemical property? Or to work out what some of the physical or chemical properties of a particular small peptide with a known sequence?

yes this is my quest basically:

design [try to find possible/compatible sequences of] a small peptide to have a particular physical or chemical property

I bet it's hard and not very accurate, but I would like to know the current abilities we have regarding this

JohnRC said:
Or to work out what some of the physical or chemical properties of a particular small peptide with a known sequence?

no, I know [some of] it's physical/chemical properties, its sequence is what I don't know

ofcourse, if finding some specific physical/chemical properties will lead me to elucidate its sequence, it would be interesting
 
  • #11
aroc91 said:
Uh, what? You asked about methods of determining primary structure. I gave you a link with three distinct methods of doing just that. If you're changing your question, you could have just clarified and said that instead of implying my reading comprehension sucks when your initial question was clear as crystal.

no bad feelings, let's agree what I was asking was:
JohnRC said:
a little different
 
  • #12
Fair enough. It just seemed like a bit of a blunt response.
 
  • #13
mather said:
yes this is my quest basically:

design [try to find possible/compatible sequences of] a small peptide to have a particular physical or chemical property

I bet it's hard and not very accurate, but I would like to know the current abilities we have regarding this

Perhaps you're looking for something like this?
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1538902/
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K