Discrete and continuous signal processing

Click For Summary
Discrete signal processing involves collecting individual data points and applying Fourier Transforms to analyze signals, as discussed in the context of NMR in analytical chemistry. The relationship between discrete and continuous signal processing is clarified by Shannon's sampling theorem, which states that continuous signals can be reconstructed from uniformly spaced samples, provided the sampling rate is at least twice the highest frequency component. This theorem applies symmetrically to both time and frequency domains, although confusion arises when sampling is described in frequency terms. An example of continuous signal processing is blending discrete samples over time to create a quasi-continuous signal. Understanding these concepts is crucial for accurate signal analysis in various applications.
flemmyd
Messages
141
Reaction score
1
First, I'm not an engineer, so I don't know this topic very well.

Anyway, we were covering Fourier Transforms in one of my analytical methods class (chem major; NMR was the topic) and the phrase "discrete signal processing" came up.

In our particular case, we collect individual points on the freq domain, do a FT and that gives us our data.

my question was: how does this related to continuous signal processing? it seems like the only way to get a continuous sample is to take an infinite number of data points- which is impossible, right?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
It is a fundamental theorem of signal processing that the continuous signal can be reconstructed exactly from samples that are uniformly spaced by time T_s, so long as the sampling rate F_s=1/T_s is equal to or greater than EDIT: twice the highest frequency component in the signal. This is known as Shannon's sampling theorem, although it was discovered independently by others (Kotelnikov in Russia, the English mathematician Whittaker, etc.).

You say you sample in frequency, which doesn't make sense. In NMR it is usually time domain data that are collected, sampled and transformed to the frequency domain. However a version of the theorem works in reverse anyway since the FT is symmetric between the two domains.
 
Last edited:
flemmyd said:
my question was: how does this related to continuous signal processing? it seems like the only way to get a continuous sample is to take an infinite number of data points- which is impossible, right?
A simple example of continuous signal processing is to take a discrete 1-second sample, and add it to 90% of the total sample (multiply the old sample by 0.9) for the previous second. Thus the total sample is quasi-continuous, and evolves as the sample signal changes. Usually, the blending of new and old signals is much faster, and the discreteness cannot be seen on a network analyzer.

Bob S
 
Last edited:
I am trying to understand how transferring electric from the powerplant to my house is more effective using high voltage. The suggested explanation that the current is equal to the power supply divided by the voltage, and hence higher voltage leads to lower current and as a result to a lower power loss on the conductives is very confusing me. I know that the current is determined by the voltage and the resistance, and not by a power capability - which defines a limit to the allowable...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K