Discrete Math: Proving Injectivity/Surjectivity of g°f

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on proving the injectivity and surjectivity of composite functions, specifically g°f. It establishes that if f is surjective and g is surjective, then g°f is surjective. Additionally, it clarifies that to prove a function is surjective, one must show that for every b ∈ B, there exists an a ∈ A such that g°f(x) = b. For injectivity, the requirement is that for each b ∈ range(f), there is only one a ∈ A that maps to it. Counterexamples can be used to demonstrate non-injectivity or non-surjectivity.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of functions and mappings in set theory
  • Familiarity with the concepts of injectivity and surjectivity
  • Basic knowledge of composite functions
  • Ability to construct counterexamples in mathematical proofs
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the definitions and properties of injective and surjective functions
  • Learn how to construct composite functions and analyze their properties
  • Explore examples of functions that are surjective but not injective
  • Practice proving injectivity and surjectivity with various functions
USEFUL FOR

Students of discrete mathematics, educators teaching function properties, and anyone interested in understanding the fundamentals of mathematical proofs related to injectivity and surjectivity.

Lolligirl
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
1. Show by example that it is possible for g°f(x) to be surjective while f(x) is not
I am confused by the general pattern of injectivity (one-to-one) and surjectivity (onto). I know the following by looking through my book:

If f and g are surjective, then g°f is surjective.
If f is surjective and g is surjective, then g°f is surjective.
If f is surjective and g is injective, then g°f is injective.
If f is surjective, then f°f is surjective.
If g°f is surjective, then g is surjective.

But I don't know the answer to the rest that I haven't included, such as if f is an injection and g is a surjection, but g°f is not an injection.

What I'm asking is this: how do you prove something is surjective or injective? We have just started this topic so I'm not entirely sure if this is correct, but I think it would have something to do with, for surjectivity, proving that for every b ∈ B, there is a corresponding a ∈ A that maps to it. For injectivity, for every a ∈ A, there is only one b ∈ B that maps to it. How is this done?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Lolligirl said:
What I'm asking is this: how do you prove something is surjective or injective? We have just started this topic so I'm not entirely sure if this is correct, but I think it would have something to do with, for surjectivity, proving that for every b ∈ B, there is a corresponding a ∈ A that maps to it. For injectivity, for every a ∈ A, there is only one b ∈ B that maps to it. How is this done?

That is exactly right for surjective. For injective, assuming we are talking about maps from A to B you should say "for each b ∈ range(f) there is only one a ∈ A that maps to it".

The answer as to how you prove a map is injective or surjective, you demonstrate the above statements. The mechanics of doing so depends on the particular problem. And, of course, to show a map isn't injective or surjective you just demonstrate a counterexample to the defining statement.
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
4K