I Disproving Carnot's Theorem: Is There an Error in My Thinking?

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the efficiency of Carnot's engine compared to other engines and the implications of reversing a Carnot engine to function as a refrigerator. It highlights a contradiction when assuming that a Carnot engine could drive a non-reversible engine backward. The conclusion reached is that while a reversible Carnot engine can be reversed to act as a refrigerator, non-reversible engines cannot be reversed in the same way. This realization corrects the initial assumption and clarifies the limitations of non-reversible heat engines. Ultimately, the conversation emphasizes the unique properties of reversible engines in thermodynamics.
phymath7
Messages
48
Reaction score
4
TL;DR
I was going through the proof of carnot theorem given in the book 'Heat and thermodynamics ' by Zemansky(seventh edition ,page 174).Here the proof was conducted by considering that the efficiency of the carnot engine is less than the other arbitrary engine.The other engine is driving the reverse carnot refrigerator .That leads to a contradiction hence carnot's theorem is proved.
But if I would assume that the efficiency of the carnot's engine is greater than the other engine and the carnot engine is driving the other engine backward as a refrigerator ,that would lead to the same contradiction hence disproving carbot's theorem! Is there something wrong I have done? Perhaps.Please point me out.
 
Science news on Phys.org
Could you show the proof in the book?
 
Lnewqban said:
Could you show the proof in the book?
Screenshot_20230205-235624_OneDrive.jpg
 
Ok,I have got it.The main point is that the carnot engine being a reversible engine can be reversed to make a refrigerator.But we can't reverse a non-reversible heat engine to make a refrigerator hence my assumption was incorrect.
 
Thread 'Can somebody explain this: Planck's Law in action'
Plotted is the Irradiance over Wavelength. Please check for logarithmic scaling. As you can see, there are 4 curves. Blue AM 0 as measured yellow Planck for 5777 K green Planck for, 5777 K after free space expansion red Planck for 1.000.000 K To me the idea of a gamma-Ray-source on earth, below the magnetic field, which protects life on earth from solar radiation, in an intensity, which is way way way outer hand, makes no sense to me. If they really get these high temperatures realized in...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
14K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
13K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
9K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
4K