Does efficiency always depend on reversibility of the engine?

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the relationship between the efficiency of thermal engines and the reversibility of processes, particularly during isochoric and isobaric phases. It highlights that while heat transfer in these processes depends solely on temperature changes, the efficiency of an engine can differ based on whether the processes are reversible or irreversible. The Carnot theorem is referenced, indicating that a reversible engine operating between the same temperature limits will have higher efficiency than an irreversible one. Participants debate the correct definition of efficiency, emphasizing that it should account for all heat inputs during a cycle. Ultimately, the conversation reveals complexities in applying theoretical efficiency formulas to practical scenarios involving different process types.
  • #31
So you can't neglect the isochoric leg on the left in Chandra's drawing after all.
 
Science news on Phys.org
  • #32
Philip Koeck said:
So you can't neglect the isochoric leg on the left in Chandra's drawing after all.
Well, I would, but that's just my own personal judgment call.
 
  • #34
Hi again.
I got a paper via another discussion forum (Research Gate). I don't seem to be able to upload it, though. It's the following paper:
A Simple Approach to Heat Engine Efficiency
Carl Salter (2000)
Journal of Chemical Education 77(8), pp. 1027 -1030

Highly recommended reading. Might help to resolve the controversy in the literature on how to calculate efficiencies.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
14K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
13K
Replies
7
Views
2K