Undergrad Dissolving Event Horizon w/Charged & Rotating BH

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around the implications of combining rotation and charge in black holes, specifically Kerr black holes. It questions whether adding electrons to a near-extremal black hole could lead to the formation of a naked singularity. The consensus is that adding mass and energy with the electrons is necessary to prevent the black hole from becoming super-extremal, which would allow for a naked singularity. Additionally, the repulsive nature of like charges means that more energy is required to bring charged electrons to the event horizon. Ultimately, the combination of rotation and charge does not qualitatively change the behavior of black holes in this context.
arusse02
Messages
24
Reaction score
0
I saw a fascinating video from PBS space time about dissolving an event horizon. See here for reference:



The video addresses rotating kerr black holes and charged black holes, but doesn't talk about the combination of rotation and charge. So what happens when you spin up the black hole as much as possible so that its an extremel black hole, and then on top of that you start adding electrons with such a trajectory that it still contributes angular momentum? Does the outward pressure of the black hole rotation and the charge combine, thus letting us easily produce a naked singularity? Or is there some effect such that adding electrons to a rotating kerr black hole would somehow expand the event horizon just enough to prevent a naked singularity? Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
arusse02 said:
I saw a fascinating video from PBS space time

This is a pop science video and is not a good source for learning the actual physics.

arusse02 said:
The video addresses rotating kerr black holes and charged black holes, but doesn't talk about the combination of rotation and charge.

Combining rotation and charge doesn't add anything qualitatively new.

arusse02 said:
is there some effect such that adding electrons to a rotating kerr black hole would somehow expand the event horizon just enough to prevent a naked singularity?

Yes. When you work out the details, it turns out that however you try to add angular momentum or charge to a near-extremal hole, you have to add enough mass along with it to keep the hole from becoming super-extremal (which is what would be required to form a naked singularity).
 
arusse02 said:
So what happens when you spin up the black hole as much as possible so that its an extremel black hole, and then on top of that you start adding electrons with such a trajectory that it still contributes angular momentum?
The electrons have mass, and need kinetic energy if they are going to contribute angular momentum. That mass and energy contribute to the mass of the hole at least as much as is necessary to keep it from becoming super-extremal. And as you add electrons and the black hole becomes charged you have to give the electrons more energy to get them to the event horizon, since like charges repel.
 
In an inertial frame of reference (IFR), there are two fixed points, A and B, which share an entangled state $$ \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(|0>_A|1>_B+|1>_A|0>_B) $$ At point A, a measurement is made. The state then collapses to $$ |a>_A|b>_B, \{a,b\}=\{0,1\} $$ We assume that A has the state ##|a>_A## and B has ##|b>_B## simultaneously, i.e., when their synchronized clocks both read time T However, in other inertial frames, due to the relativity of simultaneity, the moment when B has ##|b>_B##...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K