Distance between Compact Subspaces: Proving Existence of Minimum Distance

  • Thread starter Thread starter fireisland27
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Subspaces
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving the existence of a minimum distance between two compact subspaces A and B in a metric space (M,d). The original poster attempts to establish that the distance function d, defined as the infimum of distances between points in A and B, achieves its minimum value due to the compactness of the sets involved.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the continuity of the distance function d and its implications for achieving a minimum value. There are inquiries about the convergence of sequences in the context of compactness and continuity, as well as the application of the extreme value theorem.

Discussion Status

The conversation is progressing with participants exploring the continuity of the distance function and its implications. Some guidance has been offered regarding the use of the triangle inequality and the need for proofs concerning convergence in compact spaces. However, there is no explicit consensus on the final approach or solution.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the complexities of continuity and convergence within the framework of compact metric spaces, questioning whether certain assumptions about convergence require formal proof.

fireisland27
Messages
10
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



For a metric space (M,d) and two compact subspaces A and B define the distance d(A,B) between these sets as inf{d(x,y): x in A and y in B}. Prove that there exists an x in A and a y in B such that d(x,y)=d(A,B).

Homework Equations




The Attempt at a Solution



I want to say that d can be thought of as a function from AxB to R and because A and B are compact AxB is compact. And so if I can show that d is continuous then it achieves it's minimum by the extreme value theorem. I'm not sure how to show the continuiuty however, or if this is even the proper way to go about this.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, you want to show that if x_n\rightarrow x, y_n\rightarrow y then d(x_n,y_n)\rightarrow d(x,y), right?

Do you know already that d(x,y) is continuous in each variable separately?
 
I believe that if y is fixed then dy(x) = d(x,y) is continuous by a very simple epsilon delta proof. Is this what you mean? If so d(xn,y) converges to d(x,y). Does this automatically give us that d(xn,yn) converges to d(x,y)?
 
Start with |d(xn,yn)-d(x,y)|, add and subtract something clever, and use the triangle inequality.
 
Ok, I think it all comes together now. The only part I want to be sure of is, given a sequence {(x,y)n} in AxB which converges to (x,y), then is it as obvious as it seems that xn converges to x in A and yn converges to y in B? Does this require a proof?
If not than I think I can now show that for a sequence {(x,y)n} converging to (x,y), {d(x,y)n} converges to d(x,y) making d continuous and thus attaining its minimum on AxB which would be the distance between A and B. Does this all seem correct?
 
I think you should prove it. The general approach looks correct to me (but I didn't think very hard about it).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
7K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
39
Views
5K