Distance between Sets and their Closures

  • Thread starter Thread starter Kindayr
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sets
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving that the distance between two sets A and B in a metric space (X,d) is equal to the distance between their closures, expressed as dist(A,B) = dist(cl(A),cl(B)). The user demonstrates an understanding of the relationship between distances and closures, noting that dist(cl(A),cl(B)) is less than or equal to dist(A,B) due to the properties of closures. The user seeks further intuition on the reverse inequality, emphasizing the need to explore the definitions of closure and boundary in metric spaces.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of metric spaces and their properties
  • Familiarity with the concept of closure, denoted as cl(A)
  • Knowledge of distance functions in metric spaces
  • Basic comprehension of infimum and supremum in mathematical analysis
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the definitions and properties of closure and boundary in metric spaces
  • Explore the concept of continuity and its relation to distances in metric spaces
  • Learn about the triangle inequality in metric spaces and its implications
  • Investigate examples of metric spaces to apply the concepts of distance and closure
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, particularly those studying analysis and topology, as well as educators seeking to deepen their understanding of metric spaces and set theory.

Kindayr
Messages
159
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Suppose [itex](X,d)[/itex] is a metric space, and suppose that [itex]A,B\subseteq X[/itex]. Show that [itex]dist(A,B)=dist(cl(A),cl(B))[/itex].

Homework Equations


[itex]cl(A)=\partial A\cup A[/itex].
[itex]dist(A,B)=\inf \{d(a,b):a\in A,b\in B\}[/itex]

The Attempt at a Solution


Its clear that [itex]dist(cl(A),cl(B))\leq \min\{dist(A,B),dist(A,\partial B),dist(\partial A,B),dist(\partial A,\partial B)\}\leq dist(A,B)[/itex]. I just can't exactly find a way to go the other direction of the inequality. I'm not looking for a direct solution, just some intuition.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Here's my attempt at a solution:

[itex]dist(A,B)\leq dist(A,x)+dist(x,B)\implies \inf _{x\in cl(A)}\{dist(A,B)\}\leq \inf _{x\in cl(A)}\{dist(A,x)+dist(x,B)\}=\inf _{x\in cl(A)}\{dist(x,B)\}[/itex]. And, [itex]dist(cl(A),B)\leq dist(cl(A),y)+dist(y,B)\implies \inf _{y\in cl(B)}\{dist(cl(A),B)\}\leq\inf _{y\in cl(B)}\{dist(cl(A),y)+dist(y,B)\}=\inf _{y\in cl(B)}\{dist(cl(A),y)\}=dist(cl(A),cl(B))[/itex]. Hence, [tex]dist(A,B)=\inf _{x\in cl(A)}\{\inf _{y\in cl(B)}\{dist(A,B)\}\}\leq dist(cl(A),cl(B)).[/tex]

Does this work?
 
dist(cl(A),cl(B)) is clearly less than dist(A,B) just because A is contained in cl(A) and B is contained in cl(B). Do you agree with that? If so why? To go farther you need to deal with the definition of what cl(A) or boundary(A) in a metric space is. What is it?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K